Tag Archives: Ringo Starr

TMBP Extra: Then and now

It’s spring 2024 A.D., and when we last saw the Beatles, they were vanishing before our eyes in the “Now and Then” video, ascending to Pepperland, probably. In the moment, it was a powerful and tidy conclusion to the clip and the greater arc of their career.

But to paraphrase Paul McCartney, there is no end to what they can do together. Having reclaimed the top spot on the charts in what they trumpeted as their “last song,” the Beatles have chosen to re-audition after all.

The Beatles don’t really do tidy endings. They keep the accidental outtake “Her Majesty” after the majestic “The End.” They break up the band in the most clumsy fashion. And now, after the triumphant back-to-back successes of the Get Back docuseries in 2021 and “Now and Then” last November, the Beatles exhume a movie George Harrison called a “fiasco” and “painful,” John Lennon said made him “sick” and Ringo Starr said had “no joy.” Ringo’s quote is from two weeks ago. Ringo still has issues with Let It Be. Doesn’t he know he’s supposed to promote this thing?

Leave it to me, Ringo. I’m excited, because the return of Let It Be to Beatles canon is critically important, even as it comes off now as the Beatles trying to be completists.

Once I started listening to the full run of Nagra Tapes on my own in 2012, it completely changed my point of view on how the sessions played out. I’ve been writing that story here for 12 years.  And for most of that time – until Get Back premiered — I could only cross-reference the Nagras’ account with what amounts to a late 20th century antique (a video cassette of Let It Be) and nearly 50 years’ worth of public grievances. And that’s precisely why I didn’t think the film should have remained inaccessible for so long and truly feared it would stay buried. Because Let It Be didn’t tell the story of the Beatles breakup, the reaction to it did. This, above all else, is why Let It Be matters.

I first saw Let It Be on VHS in the mid-1980s – we rented it and subsequently pirated our own copy in a nod to the tradition of Let It Be/Get Back bootleging. Of course I bought into the idea that Let It Be showed their breakup – I was an impressionable fan, didn’t dig independently into it (where were the counter-narratives back then anyway?) and if the Beatles themselves said that’s the way to interpret the film, who am I to say otherwise? If it’s in Compleat Beatles, it was gospel. Also, remember we didn’t have the full Nagras leaked at the time, only a few hours of bootleg records, mainly of performances.

That VHS release, along with an edition on Laserdisc (a contemporary technology with the video cassette) and Betamax, represent the most modern formats on which Let It Be exists prior to its  streaming debut. I’ve written this before, but it’s worth repeating: In the time since street-legal Let It Be appeared on store shelves, you could have picked up A Hard Day’s Night on VHS, Betamax, Laserdisc, DVD, Blu-Ray, 4K UHD and streamed it.

The last UK television broadcast of Let It Be came May 8, 1982, according to the Radio Times. The film was screened sporadically in American theaters into the mid-1980s, but then it simply disappeared. Other Beatles productions remained stocked, promoted and upgraded. Magical Mystery Tour (which had its own terrible reputation for a long time) was belatedly released on VHS in October 1988 – like the other Beatle movies, it had its subsequent reissues on modern formats.

Once in a while, Let It Be’s absence was made conspicuous to the general public.

Buried in a 1991 news story about the future collectible value of Disney VHS tapes (which was really a thing, I remember it!), a mail-order video store reported it was tracking down copies of Let It Be videotapes for $180. For context, you could have bought a decent name-brand VCR for that price – or about 10 new copies of “Star Wars” or “Driving Miss Daisy” (or 13 copies of “Sweatin’ To The Oldies”).

Only three years later, on Anthology Eve, a copy of Let It Be was truly priceless.

“[A]pparently the collectors who own it aren’t willing to part with the title,” said a representative from a different specialty video store in 1994.

That was 30 years ago.

Let it Be is haunted by more than a half century of degradation and denigration as a physical product and a featured work in Beatles history, a ruin by which it’s defined.

If you wanted to watch the movie prior to its Disney+ debut, you were forced to view it on technology that peaked in the 1980s in its native format or on a digital copy ripped from those same 40-year-old analog formats. It’s a bad experience. And even in 1970, the original theatrical release was trashed, including the decision to blow up and crop the original 16mm print to 35mm, and it was hit for poor sound quality too.

(David Bowie deliberately had the Blackstar LP, released days before his death in 2016, physically degrade before your eyes, employing a hard clear plastic sleeve destined to aid in wrecking your record beyond routine wear and tear on the turntable and viewable through a window in the front cover.)

Let It Be on Laserdisc

Before you even slipped your Let It Be Laserdisc (for instance) into your player, you were hit over the head with the breakup story on the back cover:

The Beatles were breaking up. The Beatles were boys becoming men. … One squirms as Paul snips at George and Ringo for not playing their parts correctly, as if the Beatles magic was of a kind that could be whipped into shape. But you can’t blame Paul, because he, like us, saw the Beatles coming to an end.

(Paul said exactly as much during 1990s interviews for Anthology, too: “When we got in there, we showed how the breakup of a group works. We didn’t realize that we were actually sort of breaking up as it was happening.”)

That the film originally reached theaters — a reported 225 in the U.S. alone — a month after the “PAUL IS QUITTING THE BEATLES” headline shattered the music world is critical, but not alone in its importance. Some people still expected the wacky, scripted Beatles to appear on the big screen.

Let It Be followed Help! into theaters by less than five years (to get into that headspace, here are some films that came out in 2019 — it doesn’t feel like too long ago). Magical Mystery Tour, which was considered a misstep in its own time, was shown to British television audiences less than 2 ½ years prior.

Don’t think that matters? To give one example, Variety’s May 20, 1970, review of the film bemoaned “the Beatles’ past togetherness, the chummy camaraderie, the quickness to seize on a line and build a series of gags is no longer there.”

Los Angeles Times movie listings, June 20, 1970

We can nitpick even further and argue that if someone wanted to spend their $1.50 or 6/1 ½, maybe it was better spent on Woodstock, which was in theaters much at the same time (Woodstock was reaching more theaters as Let It Be completely ran out of steam). Running 100 minutes longer than Let It Be, the cinematic release of the concert documentary earned widespread critical and commercial acclaim.

Just a few pages away from the movie listings for Let It Be, reviews and stories touted the Beatles’ recent split, and record store ads promoted Paul’s new solo LP.

Or, as that same Variety review said, “If the film has an air of emptiness and resignation, it is because we know that this is almost certainly the last Beatles picture we are going to see.”

Let’s be clear about the Beatles’ audience, now and then. The younger Beatles fan base that exists today is utterly outstanding, bringing a completely different perspective on the group and, critically, lacking the baggage so many of us had to live with and work to shake free. I’m a second-generation fan, a born in the mid-1970s and too late to be around for Beatles’ first run, but I remember the possibility all four could one day reunite. And I remember hearing on the radio John was killed.

I grew up with The Compleat Beatles, Lennon Remembers, Shout! and later aged with Anthology and Drugs, Divorce and a Slipping Image – so the story was baked in: Let It Be was hell, period.

Even the Beatles’ own records promoted that this was a bad time.  The back cover  to Reel Music (1982) said “Let It Be poignantly documents the group’s disintegration while capturing their inimitable songwriting technique,” while the liner notes to Let It Be … Naked nearly 20 years later put it this way:

It is the Twickenham sessions that have characterised the whole Let It Be project as an unhappy one both in the minds of the Beatles themselves and anyone who saw the documentary footage in the movie.

In 1970, Get Back was merely the name of a song and an abandoned LP (and film title) while the Nagras sat securely in Apple Records’ vault. Multiple generations loved the Beatles, but they were all “first-generation” fans who witnessed the group’s evolution and dissolution in real time, not forced to read about it in a book or watching it from a documentary. When Let It Be was promoted in theaters, there wasn’t a new generation of fans to reach.

Let It Be movie posters as displayed at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 2022.

Much as the audience mattered, the four most important figures requiring appropriate contextualization are the Beatles themselves. To them, Let It Be wasn’t just a monthlong session in 1969 and a movie premiering after a breakup in May 1970.  The Let It Be experience spanned the 16 months in between too. That’s a long time.

It’s time that included rejected cuts of the film (“Let me put it this way. I’ve had three calls this morning to say [Yoko Ono footage] should come out” is how director Michael Lindsay-Hogg remembered the reaction to an initial screening).

Those 16 months included several rejected Glyn John edits of the soundtrack album, tapes eventually being dumped on Phil Spector and Paul hating much of what Spector did.

It included John saying he wanted a divorce from the Beatles, and later McCartney accepting it, properly beginning the Beatles solo era.

It had all of the Northern Songs drama and the disintegrating Apple. And Allen Klein brooding over everything.

All of that happened to the Beatles as part of their Let It Be-era experience, when a long and lonely “winter of discontent” really spans six calendar seasons. We can separate an 80-minute film from the period, but how could they?

The music wasn’t blackballed the same way the movie was. I always thought it was great, and I never bought John’s complaints about it (“[Phil Spector] was given the shittiest load of badly recorded shit – and with a lousy feeling to it – ever. And he made something out of it … When I heard it, I didn’t puke.”).

I may not have been in under the lights and in front of the cameras, but I do listen to the music and haven’t puked either. It makes me feel quite good! Let It Be made its CD debut in tandem with Abbey Road to great fanfare in 1987, capping the band’s reissue campaign on the new-ish format. A dozen songs from the sessions appeared on 1996’s Anthology 3.  Seven years later in 2003, a reworked mix emerged as Let It Be … Naked.  We can even throw in Reel Music and the Movie Medley for more examples that they fully incorporated Let It Be’s music into their catalog since its release.

I think the film just sat there as this giant symbolic target. It was harder to pan the companion soundtrack LP when it was such a smash – it had the biggest initial sale of any LP in American history at $26 million in 2 weeks. The movie, on the other hand, was a relative box office failure, pulling in $1.06 million gross. That sounds like a lot of money until you see A Hard Day’s Night made $11 million and Help! pulled in $12 million.

If the music from the same sessions have been tolerated by Beatles Inc. over the last 50 years, what was so damning about Let It Be’s visuals for so long? Was it the scant minutes featuring Yoko in the frame? The “confrontation” between Paul and George. The waltz? We know it wasn’t about Billy Preston, and the rooftop has long been justifiably lionized. The three completed songs performed in the basement (“Two of Us,” “Let It Be” and “The Long and Winding Road”) are perhaps staged a bit too formally, but those have resurfaced at various times in Beatle releases (eg., two of the three on the 2015 “1” DVD).

There is very little in the way of actual dialogue – as in full, extensive conversations — in Let It Be (and in its original print, which is very muddy compared to the MAL-enhanced sounds of the 2020s).

Much of that dialogue fits on one side of a 45, in fact:

George has been quoted multiple times referring to Yoko’s “freakout” with John in Let It Be – but that never made the final cut. An early edit long colored George’s opinion of the film – it wasn’t a first-hand memory, since he wasn’t in the room when Yoko performed with the others. Did George even see the theatrical version of Let It Be?

It’s probably a matter of simple bias: When you listen to Let It Be you can’t see Paul and George bickering, John asking if they can “play a fast one,” Paul yawning, Ringo looking like he’s going through the motions or Yoko just sitting there.

“I’ll play, you know, whatever you want me to play. Or I won’t play at all, if you don’t want me to play. Whatever it is that will please you, I’ll do it.”

The result is actually backed up by science – what we hear isn’t as sticky as what we see.

Paul and George did bicker. Yoko did just sit there. That’s real, even if that’s not all they did.

What is spread out over eight hours in Get Back simply didn’t translate as well over 80 minutes in Let It Be. Some of that was by choice — maybe it could have benefitted by one less oldies cover and one more evolution of an original song — but there was really little wiggle room in the format.

We’re lucky to have Get Back, for its clarity of picture and sound, and all that footage. Normally a recording session wouldn’t have a particular story to tell — group frustrations come to a boil, a member walks out, but they rally and stage a memorable performance, etc. — and in 1969/70, the Beatles never intended to tell anything more than “this is how an album is made, and here we are performing it as the payoff” as the original TV concept.

And to that end – with Get Back as its companion — Let It Be should be considered an honest depiction of the band. Still, it’s always been a struggle to describe what exactly Let It Be is.

The original movie trailer (which was given an homage in the 2024 Disney+ trailer) asked viewers to view the band “rehearsing, recording, rapping, relaxing, philosophizing, creating.”  One movie ad was more blunt: “The Beatles singing their songs, doing their thing.”

Let It Be appeared on HBO in the late 1970s, and the cable network’s guide described the film on different occasions as “A film to make you smile” and, simply, “McCartney sings Besame Mucho.”

The original movie poster (“an intimate bioscopic experience”) and present-day blurb on Disney+ (“Available for the first time in over 50 years, the original 1970 film about the Beatles”) both tout the plain fact that Let It Be is a movie as it’s main descriptor.

It feels like the original VHS box got the story right, with a positive spin not common at the time:

An exhilarating documentary of the making of an album by The Beatles, the film concentrates on the many recording sessions that went into the production of the “Let it Be” album. It offers a unique glimpse into the creative process of this world-renowned group as well as the subtle relationships among the individual members. There is jamming of old songs and painstaking work on new ones. In search of a new direction, The Beatles play an inspired concert on the roof of their London offices.

In the announcement of the 2024 reissue of Let It Be, Peter Jackson said Get Back and Let It Be “enhance each other.”

 ‘Let It Be’ is the climax of ‘Get Back,’ while ‘Get Back’ provides a vital missing context for ‘Let It Be.’

That first part sounds reversed, but the director is absolutely right. Let It Be isn’t backward compatible because of how it directly influenced the subsequent 50 years of Beatles history. Let It Be owns it’s baggage, period.

Get Back told a specific story, but it was reactionary, too, not simply giving a nod to Let It Be, but deliberately clarifying — and in a sense undermining — some of the original film’s more negative moments.

My favorite example (of several): Paul tries to stifle a yawn in Let It Be,  50-year-old proof that the band is bored. But a drowsy Beatles performance of “I’m So Tired” results in a minute-long sequence in Get Back, with everyone yawning. George yawns his way through Paul’s magical “Get Back” origin story.

For all the drama in Get Back — agonizing over the band’s future, dealing with walkouts (George) and sit-ins (Yoko) — the only real resolution we get was to the problem of how to stage the show, by going onto the roof. Both films feature the same ending, with Get Back criminally dustheaping the full indoor performances, a robbery rectified with Let It Be’s restoration.

No matter how Michael Lindsay-Hogg edited Let It Be, he was stuck in his time. We all knew what came after the credits in 1970 — it wasn’t a gag reel or sneak preview, but a very public breakup, a breakup that was inevitable whether the January 1969 sessions were in front of cameras or not.

“We filmed the whole thing showing all the trauma we go through,” John said in the April 12, 1969, Melody Maker, which hit newsstands right around the time the “Get Back” b/w “Don’t Let Me Down” single was released and more than a year before Let It Be reached theaters.

Tellingly, there’s more to the quote: “Every time we make an album we go through a hellish trip.” (emphasis mine).

Let It Be was put together  in the Beatles’ time, yet could only reflect the past tense. It’s no accident Michael put Paul’s piano rendition of “Adagio for Strings” —  once voted the ““saddest classical” song — over the opening credits.

Fifty years later, with a different concept and such a different, wider audience, Get Back allowed — and still allows — us to dream on a future.  It freed the Beatles from the events that came after it. That story, so focused on the friendship of the band, directly set up “Now and Then.” The same rooftop ending delivered an alternate ending.

The existence of Get Back offers the original Let It Be the same liberation. Today, in 2024 and beyond, it’s indeed the climax to Get Back, the scar that healed over, at once an apocryphal footnote and a window into the post-breakup era — if you know to look for it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Extra

Jan. 14: Morning, Paul! Morning, Rich!

This time, Paul McCartney’s line was delivered with a smile: “And then there was one.”

It was up to the viewers of the 2021 Get Back docuseries more than 50 years later to make out the invisible wink and deliberate nod to Paul’s tearful “and then there were two” from a day before — though in 21st century TV time, it was only 12 minutes earlier.

While there was just one Beatle at Twickenham Film Studios in the early going on January 14, 1969, Paul wasn’t alone for too long, not even 20 minutes on the Nagra reels capturing the sessions’ audio largely in real time.

 

Then there were two once again as a sleep-deprived Ringo Starr bounded in, and the Beatles’ rhythm section exchanged exaggerated greetings.

Ringo: “Morning, Paul!”
Paul: “Morning, Rich!”
Ringo: “How are you this morning?
Paul: “OK!”

After a full-arm stretch and crack of the knuckles, Paul – who had been sitting at the piano — struck the keys, and Ringo immediately joined in.

Maybe I’m not giving January 1969 Ringo enough credit as a piano player, but I’ll leave it as an open question if this was a pure improvisation or something specific Paul and Ringo had worked on before.

This is not to say Ringo was a finished product as a piano player. You can see him bracing one hand with another as he slapped out high notes — maybe it was just a gag —  playing the high notes while Paul pounded out the chords.

Paul casually delivered a lyric to their song. A jumpy slice of New Orleans improvisational piano jazz, it lasted all of 70 seconds.

Well, I bought a piano the other day
I didn’t know music to play
You had to play the goddamn thing
Oh, baby!
(Or something close to that)

It’s an amusing callback to Ringo’s own “Picasso” from early in the sessions, from the “I bought a Picasso” line down to the closing “oh baby,” which was a signature Ringo closing lyric at this point. Paul and Ringo clearly had a great time playing together, something that was obvious to viewers in 1970 as much as it is to us today.

This little slice of life coexists in Let It Be and Get Back in nearly identical presentations. Let It Be’s version lasts all of 5 seconds longer – both are slightly edited down from the original performance.  The differences between the two visuals are purely cosmetic and seem like change for change’s sake, showing the duo’s hands at the piano when the other shows a view from their left, for instance.

But then there were two (more important differences).

The first is the timeline. In Let It Be, the sequence is preceded by a January 9 version of “One After 909,” appearing about 13 ½ minutes into the film. After the piano jam, Let It Be sends the viewer into a January 6 rehearsal of “Two of Us” that eventually leads to the “I’ll play if you want me to play” argument (Director Michael Lindsay-Hogg uses Paul’s running his hands through his hair at the end of the performance to lead directly to the next scene of ensuing frustration.)

The transition as it appears in Let It Be.

Get Back roughly follows the progression in real time on the morning of January 14. It doesn’t come immediately after clapper loader Paul Bond said he wanted himself to buy a piano as it does in Get Back, but you can certainly see why that narrative device was used, and it was close enough in real time to work.

There’s another very notable divergence between the two films. When it came to the credits in 2021, then there were three (songwriters). Based on that clear first lyric and presumption it was a newly published original, the song was credited on screen as “I Bought a Piano The Other Day,” a Lennon/McCartney/Starkey composition.

Even with John clearly not yet on site, the Lennon/McCartney credit structure was used (as it was elsewhere with similar absent credits – but not future solo songs), with Rich Starkey an obvious contributor.  (Just look at “Piano Piece [Bonding].” That shouldn’t be a Lennon/McCartney song, since it’s probably already a Jesse Fuller original. More on that in the previous post.)

To paraphrase an earlier lyric credited to the Lennon/McCartney/Starkey songwriting trio, they didn’t even think of it as something with a name — or something long-forgotten that already had a name for the last 50 years. After all, it already had a title, and it wasn’t “I Bought a Piano The Other Day.”

Nobody has never spun an official version of “Jazz Piano Song” on a turntable or streamed it on Spotify. But that recording, originally released as part of the Let It Be film but not on the soundtrack LP, is the real thing. “Jazz Piano Song” – admittedly not the most dynamic title — was copyrighted in the U.S. on  July 8, 1970, by Northern Songs and Startling Music, credited to McCartney/Starkey. It’s a matter of semantics if it was really released, but it certainly came out.

From the July-December 1970 volume of the Library of Congress’ Catalog of Copyright Entries of Music.

Today in 2024, then, there are two (copyrighted versions of the same song): “Jazz Piano Song” and “I Bought A Piano” are one in the same. I can only guess the decision to separately copyright the latter was an oversight, a generic disregard and abandonment of “Jazz Piano Song,” Let It Be and its era. Kudos to the Lennon Estate for sneaking away a few extra dollars and pounds for a song he had absolutely nothing to do with and was already accounted for, credit-wise.

It took more than 25 years for the McCartney/Starkey duo to team up on a follow-up composition. The liner notes to Paul’s 1997 LP Flaming Pie might obliquely reference “Jazz Piano Song,” saying in the description of “Really Love You” that it was “[c]redited to McCartney/Starkey – a first-ever credit for a released tune.” That note could also be referring to “Angel in Disguise,” an early ‘90s Paul demo with an added verse by Ringo, and thus another McCartney/Starkey unreleased track. Or it could just be covering behinds on the assumption there must have been other unrecorded and unreleased McCartney/Starkey tracks from 1962-1997.

From the 1997 liner notes to Flaming Pie.

It’s at this point on January 14, 1969, the focus shifted from an obscure McCartney/Starkey song credited twice into a modest hit song written by Paul McCartney alone that wasn’t credited to him at all. (Some of this sequence appeared in Get Back, albeit compressed and a little out of order, too, although not in any way that misrepresented the moment.)

“Did you write ‘Woman’ by Peter and Gordon?”  Michael asked. “I loved that song.”

Paul said he did too.

“Woman” was a 1966 single for the since broken-up duo. It was also a deliberate experiment conducted by Paul.

“Bernard Webb, an English law student in Paris, sent this song to the Beatles, who having plenty of their own, passed it on to their old mates,” wrote one representative review of the song, outlining the origin story fed to the press.

Like Paul Ramon before, and Apollo C. Vermouth and Percy Thrillington to come, Bernard Webb was one James Paul McCartney, this time taking a pseudonym – “a very inconspicuous name,” per Paul in the May 1966 Beatles Book magazine — in a ploy to see how well his song would chart as an anonymous author and not half of the world’s most famous pop songwriting team. The answer was modestly well, with the big production number landing in the top 30 in the U.K. and inside the top 15 in the U.S., although some of the movement up the charts did come after the secret was let out that Paul was behind the curtain.

The “mammoth Peter and Gordon treatment,” as Paul described it, gnawed at the songwriter years later. (Meanwhile, as we learn by watching Get Back, Ringo spent part of this performance mugging for the cameras.)

“We did a much better one very first time we ever did it,” Paul said on January 14, after singing the first verse a capella. “It was very dry. Just little. With like about eight violins. …  We were very fussy at the time, didn’t like it, so it got turned into a mammoth ballad.”

Modestly, he concluded, “It’s a great song” before delivering a straightforward performance at the piano, repeating the first verse several times. He later played it again imitating the “great big Gordon bit” to laughter.

I wonder if Peter’s still got the original thing of that, cause we did a great version first time we did it. Only Gordon couldn’t get the high notes. … But it was all right though, it was OK. It’s just we were so fussy we thought “this is the song, this is the one.” And they’re so fussy about it, that we chucked it, jacked it in and just let them go and do it again. But they did it the next time as mammoth Peter and Gordon treatment. It’s too sort of big. The first time we did, it was little, it was great.

An acetate of the “original thing” – purportedly featuring Paul on drums — went to auction in 2013, and quickly founds its way online.

A mammoth treatment isn’t necessarily a disqualifier for Paul, though, who resumed playing the piano after a brief conversation celebrating Johnny Cash (look for that in a future post!). In Get Back, Paul introduces the song saying, “I had one this morning.” In fact, he said that earlier, when playing “The Day I Went Back to School.”  On the Nagras, Paul gave no indication the song was an original or anything beyond something he was improvising.

Paul scatted a few indecipherable lines, although a few are identifiable, sung in an exaggerated fashion: “We’re just busy riding, driving in the back seat of my car.”

Two years before it concluded RAM (and eight years before Thrillington’s “cover”), “The Back Seat of My Car” was new enough Glyn asked if Paul was playing a Beach Boys song.

“It’s just like a skit on them,” Paul replied.

Indeed it played out like a comedy– thankfully, this sequence made Get Back, too – as Paul openly played to his audience, embellishing high and low harmonies and vocalizing brass and percussion as he shared draft lyrics of teenage romance. “Gee, it’s getting late!” drew big laughs, for instance. Mexico City hadn’t been introduced as a destination, and the subjects didn’t yet believe that they can’t be wrong.

Conceived in summer 1968, “The Back Seat of My Car” — which was ultimately credited to Paul alone — wasn’t finished in January 1969, but Paul clearly had scoped out the grand scale of the song, more than two years before he’d ultimately employ an orchestra to perform George Martin’s score for the song.

Having completed his enjoyable reveal of “The Back Seat of My Car,” Paul left the stage to take a call, and the Nagra microphones shifted to a conversation between Ringo and Michael, following a brief appearance by Mal Evans. The roadie himself had just taken a call from John, who for a consecutive day was late to the session.

“What did Mal say? … What’s going to happen this morning?” Michael asked Ringo.

“Nothing,” he replied. But …

“This afternoon, watch out!”

1 Comment

Filed under Day by day

Get Back advent calendar: Countdown to the sessions

The Beatles, as depicted by John Lennon in November 1968, as published in the  December 7, 1968, issue of New Music Express.

In my faith, we count down the 25 days to the start of the Get Back/Let It Be sessions. This is completely normal.

To operate this particular digital advent calendar, simply click the current day below and read up on what our boys and their extended circle were doing in these days leading up to their Most Holy Assemblage at Twickenham Film Studios on January 2, 1969. 

(You can also click on any previously published days)

24 days until the start of the Get Back sessions: Setting the scene

This was a really good time to be a Beatles fan.

Pick up any of the big music papers, and you could read about the tantalizing prospect of the band’s imminent stage return. It may not be at London’s Roadhouse as first rumored, but it’ll be somewhere.

And they’ll play all-new music! No, they didn’t need to start writing stuff from scratch. They just put out brand-new double album, after all. Their eponymous LP landed at the top of the charts just a few days earlier in its first full week on the shelves. The White Album was still new enough that reviews continued to dot newspapers around the world.

Of course, they featured on the singles charts, too – “Hey Jude” was still Top 10 in the US, and hanging around the Top 30 in the UK even after 14 weeks. The Paul McCartney-produced “I’m the Urban Spaceman” by the Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band sat at its peak of No. 13 on the UK charts, while Mary Hopkin’s Apple Records smash “Those Were the Days” – also produced by Paul – stuck in the US and UK charts, even after its peak (Paul had within days just wrapped sessions producing Hopkin’s debut LP).

On the UK charts, the only thing hotter than McCartney was … McCartney.  Paul’s brother Mike, performing as Mike McGear with the Scaffold, had the No. 2 song in the country with “Lily the Pink.” It would be on its way to the top of the pops.

It wasn’t just on vinyl  — the Beatles dominated as true kings of all media. Yellow Submarine, out since the summer in the UK but in US theaters for only a few weeks, had established its reputation as a clear-cut critical and commercial smash. Even in the world of print, the Beatles were easily accessible with Hunter Davies’ authorized biography flying off shelves since its release in October.

A sampling of headlines from American papers on December 8-9, 1968

The book was outdated when it came to the Beatles’ personal lives. A 26-year-old bachelor, Paul had already seen his engagement to Jane Asher fizzle, and gossip about his girlfriend Linda Eastman was mainstream at this point. Syndicated articles sourced from a recent story in the Daily Mirror teased the “romance” but Paul remained evasive.   

“I can’t say what will happen,” said Paul. “It may happen, it may not. Let’s say Linda is with me now and I’m very happy about it.”

John Lennon, who was officially divorced for about a month, wasn’t so coy. Naked on record racks since November 1968 — more in theory than in practice, since the record wasn’t easy to purchase —  John and girlfriend Yoko Ono were as public a thing as possible. For all the commentary and protest of the Two Virgins cover, one that was published in American papers this week was perhaps a low blow, when a former disciple of the Maharishi objected to John’s depiction because “he’s got a horrible-looking body.” His body of work was set to expand — he’d rehearse for an imminent performance on the Rock and Roll Circus the following day.

George Harrison was finally back in England after a dynamic few months in the US. He produced Jackie Lomax’s debut LP for Apple and hobnobbed with Frank Sinatra in LA and enjoyed Thanksgiving with Bob Dylan and the Band in New York before winging it home (media reports said he returned by sea, but in the January 1969 Beatles Book Magazine, Mal Evans clarified they flew back to England).

Budding actor Ringo Starr had Candy in the can, ready for imminent release, and was studying the script for his next role – The Magic Christian, due to begin shooting at Twickenham Film Studios in February 1969.

Meanwhile in New York – where both George and Paul separately spent leisure time in previous weeks – Billy Preston was hard at work, in the midst of performing with Ray Charles during his two-week residency at the Copacabana.

The British music scene was facing serious fractures in early December 1968, with the likes of Cream, Traffic, the Hollies, the Animals and Jethro Tull  all breaking up or facing prominent departures in just the last few days and weeks.

It only went to further contrast the rest of the world from the mighty Beatles, who were due to reassemble and continued to push to greater heights even while standing at what could be seen as their peak.

23 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

While a Beatles group performance remained aspirational, John Lennon’s Dirty Mac prepared to do the real thing after spending this Tuesday rehearsing. Formed explicitly for the Rolling Stones’ Rock and Roll Circus on just a few days’ notice, John fronted this two-day supergroup that included Eric Clapton (guitar), Keith Richards (bass) and Mitch Mitchell (drums). Yoko Ono would perform with the Dirty Mac, but would be credited separately. The January 1969 issue of the Beatles Book Monthly assured us George was hoping to join the group but couldn’t because of “urgent remixing sessions” for the Jackie Lomax LP.

Having been some days in preparation: The cast of the Rock and Roll Circus pose for promotional photos on Dec. 10, 1968

The Rock and Roll Circus deserves a deep study of its own for how it relates to the Beatles – this post isn’t it – but it’s important to mark the personnel present. Michael Lindsay-Hogg, who had an established working relationship with both the Beatles and the Stones, directed the program and tapped Tony Richmond as cinematographer.  Glyn Johns, another Stones veteran, engineered the Circus’ sound, while photographer Ethan Russell – himself an increasing part of the Stones’ circle – documented the show. These figures would be at the core of the small group chronicling the Beatles starting just a few weeks later.

Michael related how the band was formed in a 2019 story in NME:

So Mick called John and he said, ‘Yeah, I’ve been playing with Eric Clapton just for fun, he could play, who could play bass?’ And Mick said, ‘Maybe Keith could play bass’. We all liked Mitch Mitchell from the Hendrix Experience so in that one phone call we had John Lennon, Eric Clapton, Keith Richard and Mitch Mitchell to fill that supergroup spot. So that’s not too shabby. That’s the way it was at the time. It was partly to do with the friendship and the mutual admiration that the key players had for each other that made the show possible in the first place.”

Intertel’s Wycombe Road studios at Stonebridge Park in Wembley served as the venue. Michael said during Get Back sessions that he tried to book the Houses of Parliament for the Circus, but “they didn’t go for it.”

Among the songs rehearsed by the Dirty Mac – named as a play on Fleetwood Mac, per John – were the Beatles’ “Revolution” and a warmup jam, neither of which were recorded for the show itself. The songs would eventually surface on a 2019 reissue of the Rock and Roll Circus.

A report from the Dec. 21 Melody Maker conceded rehearsals progressed … slowly.

During the first day rehearsal which began at midday there were seventeen items to run through. By five o’clock only three of four acts had been dealt with.

John’s son, Julian, was on hand, and the day included a promotional photo shoot for the event. It also included a variety of auditioning circus acts. Michael wrote in his 2012 memoir, Luck and Circumstance, that Yoko told him if he chose to employ the boxing kangaroos on site in the Circus, John wouldn’t perform the next day.

“I’m not sure if she’d talked to John about this,” Michael wrote.  “But needless to say, the kangaroos hopped back into their holding pen and were not seen again.”

Yoko, Julian and John at the Rock and Roll Circus rehearsals on Dec. 10, 1968

According to a 2019 interview with Michael in Beatlefan, John wasn’t the first choice to front a supergroup on the show (it was Steve Winwood). He wasn’t even the first Beatle considered.

We first thought, would Paul McCartney want to form a group for this show? Paul would leap into anything if he thought it was right, but given all the other stuff that was going on, we didn’t think that Paul would want to appear without The Beatles. Mick and I didn’t think it was gonna happen. Then, we thought John might have the temperament to jump into the water without his flip-flops on.

Turns out Paul was the one packing his flip-flops on Dec. 10.

Come for the sandy beaches; stay because they’re an old Napoleonic War ally. A travel story on the Algarve, from the Dec. 12, 1968, issue of the Birmingham Evening Mail.

The Algarve was already trendy. Indeed, Paul experienced Portugal’s expanding resort region a few years earlier in early summer 1965, vacationing in Albufiera with then-girlfriend Jane Asher. He thrived there too: It’s where he started writing the lyrics to “Yesterday,” while batting away wedding rumors.

In 1968, Beatles biographer Hunter Davies informally invited everyone in the band to his Praia da Luz rental home, a former sardine factory. He wasn’t expecting Paul to spontaneously take him up on the offer this Tuesday night.

Many Years From Now, Paul’s 1997 authorized biography by friend Barry Miles, lays out the story: With Neil Aspinall’s help, Paul chartered a night flight and was joined by girlfriend Linda Eastman and her daughter, Heather. After landing at Faro Airport and cabbing it 50 miles, Paul woke up Davies with “shouts and pebbles on his window,” before he stuck his host with the taxi bill (Paul didn’t have any local currency).

“I thought at first it might be some drunken fishermen, on their way home,” Davies wrote in his own 2006 memoir “The Beatles, Football and Me.” Then I realised someone was shouting out my name – in a Liverpool accent. ‘Wake up Hunter Davies, you lazy bugger.’”

The account in Many Years From Now establishes that Dec. 11, 1968, is the date Paul departed to and arrived in Portugal.

I think that date is wrong, and instead, Paul and Co. arrived a day earlier on Dec. 10.

The reason is simple: A local, contemporary account said so, and it said so while he was in Portugal, not almost 30 years later in a memoir.

As published in the daily newspaper Diário de Lisboa on Dec. 11, 1968 (the 3rd, 4th and 5th editions), and translated by Google in 2023 (the emphasis in the first paragraph is mine):

The Beatle McCartney on vacation in the Algarve with an American photographer

In a bi-reactor that he rented especially for this purpose, one of the members of the most famous quartet today (<<Beatles>>) arrived in Faro yesterday, on a direct trip from London, Paul McCartney.

McCartney, composer and lyricist whose songs have enjoyed the greatest popularity, was accompanied by American photographer Linda See and her daughter, Louise.

As the inn and the house in Albufeira (where McCartney usually goes) are closed, the young <<Beatle>> settled in Alvor.

Remember that Paul met Linda just over two months ago, when he went to New York to label his composition with which he launched Mary Hopkin into the great world of the song <<Those were the days, my friend.>>

After returning to London, Linda came to see him, bringing his daughter.

McCartney was in the Algarve two years ago with his love at the time, Jane Asher, from whom he had separated some time ago.

To clarify some things: A bi-reactor is an airplane. The article used Heather’s middle name as her first, and late in the story said it was his daughter. They also used Linda’s married name “See,” which she stopped using in 1965.

BUT. I feel a newspaper wouldn’t get the day wrong, when it was happening within the last 24 hours. Saying Paul came “yesterday” is a lot more easily verifiable on a deadline than a foreign celebrity’s girlfriend’s last name or daughter’s first name. Think of the timeline involved, too: If Paul arrived late on the 10th, it would make sense news wouldn’t get out until early on the 11th, and indeed the news wasn’t in the first two earlier editions of Diário de Lisboa, but was in the final three.

With the timeline corrected, we’ll catch up more on the McCartney-Eastman vacation in the coming days as they settle in.

Just as Paul eyed a quiet escape on the Continent, he won a popularity contest back home. In a Daily Express poll of 5,000 readers unveiled on Dec. 10, Paul, the “driving force behind the Beatles” who “looks like a naughty choirboy,” more than doubled up the votes of runner-up Ringo Starr. George, liked for – among other reasons – his “hairy legs,” and John brought up the rear.

Rough as it was for George, at least wife Pattie Boyd could recoup some family pride, capping off this Tuesday as one of Britain’s “best-hatted women.” Specifically, Pattie earned milliner Edward Mann’s honor “for pioneering the floppy, one of this year’s best-selling styles.” Mary Hopkin was likewise recognized, for a boater hat.

22 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

“The Rolling Stones needed a family show, and Mick [Jagger] wanted a family show. Mick said he wanted Ed Sullivan without Ed Sullivan.”

That’s how director Michael Lindsay-Hogg described the Rock and Roll Circus to Paul McCartney a few weeks later, in the midst of the Beatles’ Get Back sessions.

Fronted by John Lennon – introduced as Winston Leg-Thigh the Dirty Mac’s evening show at Intertel’s studios in Wembley marked his first performance away from the Beatles since their formation. This circus act had a safety net, with John backed by Eric Clapton (guitar), Keith Richards (bass) and Mitch Mitchell (drums), as seasoned as ad-hoc band you could build.

Their fiery performance of “Yer Blues,” a fresh Beatles cut from the new White Album, speaks for itself and lent itself perfectly to the band. They sound absolutely terrific.

Yoko spent “Yer Blues” on stage in a black bag. She emerged as the band, joined by renowned Israeli violinist Ivry Gitlis, performed a song initially called “Her Blues” that was ultimately released as “Whole Lotta Yoko.” Let’s call it a basic rock-blues improv jam with a dueling lead provided by violin and Yoko’s imitable vocals.

The director didn’t expect Yoko’s performance. Here’s how he recalled it in 2019 for NME:

All I’d noticed vaguely was at the beginning of ‘Yer Blues’, someone was getting into a black bag at the edge of the stage, but I didn’t really take much notice of that because I was trying to figure out the best way to shoot the song. Then Yoko comes near the mike and you see John and Yoko looking at each other and John going ‘go ahead, go ahead’. Then Yoko starts to sing. I’d never heard her sing before and of course it’s very riveting and it didn’t stop. … She had been a quite well-regarded abstract artist in New York in the ‘50s, so she had a reputation in the avant garde art world. She wasn’t just a girl who turned up, she came with a reputation, although not many people in England knew who she’d been in New York.

The Dirty Mac wrapped their set early enough in the proceedings to allow John and Yoko to venture to BBC’s Broadcasting House and appear live during the first hour of John Peel’s “Night Shift” program, which ran from 12:05-2 a.m. Really, this should be the first item for December 12, but we’ll keep this at December 11, since John shared his immediate reaction to the Circus.

“It’s very exhilarating,” John told Peel. “The Who were who-ing, the Stones were stoning, the clowns were clowning.

 

Asked what other projects he was working on, John clarified, “[The Circus] wasn’t a project. That was Mick saying, ‘Do us a favor, Stevie Winwood’s pulled out.’”

Elsewhere in the same interview, John read “Jock and Yono” as well as “Once Upon a Pool Table,” two poems that would imminently appear on the Beatles’ 1968 fan club Christmas record. He introduced the poems as “a piece of paper called ‘Charles.’”

John and Yoko also promoted their December 18 Alchemical Wedding event scheduled for the Royal Albert Hall (“go naked” was Yoko’s suggestion) and, relatedly, discussed Two Virgins.

“I can’t see it being a pop hit,” John said. Still, he was chuffed it sold 700 copies the previous day in some “hidden underground-type open-air shops.” Referring to the couple’s growing inventory of recorded material, John said “when we’re old and gray, we’ll put out all the backlog we got.”

Listeners were treated to a brief live song: John briefly crooned — and whistled — “It’s Now or Never” to fill time.

After the interview, John and Yoko made the 10-mile return trek back to the Circus, which continued to around 5 a.m., when the Stones finally finished recording their set.

John and Yoko whoop it up following the Stones’ performance of “Sympathy For the Devil.”

Ostensibly staged to promote Beggars Banquet, released just days earlier on December 6, the Rolling Stones mothballed Rock and Roll Circus, which wouldn’t see a formal release until 1996. Conventional wisdom holds the show was shelved because the Stones were upstaged by the Who.

Members of the Beatles were likely among the very first people to have seen initial edits of the show, while the band was working with the same director in subsequent weeks during the Get Back sessions. Indeed, the Rock and Roll Circus often served as a tangible point of comparison as the Beatles searched for their own live show concept in January 1969.

Paul McCartney very badly wanted to enjoy the Who’s terrific performance of “A Quick One, While He’s Away,” but blamed Michael for poorly capturing his subjects.

Paul, from the January 13 Nagra tapes:

It didn’t look right. I know it was a bad print. But like, I didn’t ever get into any one of the Who. Ever. It was the event all the time. And no one digs that. That’s over, that sort of event, I think. It really is now, if you’re trying to show him, I just really say just stick [the camera] on him.

Pete Townshend, I never saw him. I’d really like to look at him for a long time cause he fascinates me. … I’d like to really just see what he looks like after he’s done that thing (presumably his windmill guitar move).

You know, [I’d like to see] Keith Moon just sort of jabbering away on the drums, just for a whole number almost.

Naturally, John’s reflection on the evening was experiential, not observational, and it stuck with him to the end of his life, a dozen years later. John opened up to the BBC in his penultimate interview, on December 6, 1980, sharing these thoughts, in the context of the Toronto Rock and Roll Revival as well as the Rock and Roll Circus:

It was instantly creative, and there was no big palaver, it wasn’t like this set format show that I’ve been doing with the Beatles, where you go on and do these same numbers, “I Want to Hold Your Head,” you know (laughing). And the show lasts 20 minutes and nobody’s listening, they’re just screaming, and the amps are as big as a peanut. And it was more of a spectacular rather than rock and roll.

The first time I performed without the Beatles for years was the Rock and Roll Circus, and it was great to be on stage with Eric and Keith Richard and on a different noise coming out behind me even though I was still singing and playing the same style. It was just great experience. I thought, wow, it’s fun with other people you know?

And speaking of other people, let’s introduce one more key character at this circus – call him a firebreather, a strongman or a clown, maybe all three. Allen Klein was a footnote to John on December 11, 1968, but emerged as one of the most critical figures in Beatles history.

From Fred Goodman’s 2015 biography on Klein:

He came to the all-night recording session for only one reason: to meet John Lennon. He achieved his goal, but just. The set was hot and cramped, no place for a conversation let alone a full-blown seduction. Allen had to settle for a handshake and hope that he’d finally registered with Lennon as more than just another outstretched palm.

“I didn’t know what to make of him,” John recalled in the 1970 Lennon Remembers interview. “We just shook hands.”

At the precise moment John acted as the ultimate multimedia showman, appearing on stage before an audience and TV cameras before shuttling over to a live radio appearance, Paul sought to escape the spotlight and work on some things in private.

Breakfast at Hunter’s. Portugal, December 1968.

The last time he went to Portugal, in 1965 with then-girlfriend Jane Asher, the headline in the Daily Mirror screamed “A marriage hint by Beatle Paul.” But it was merely a hint, Paul conceding, “When, we don’t know. We prefer to get older and know each other better.”  The couple was engaged, but never married, and Paul eventually began dating Linda Eastman.

Paul tied the knot with Linda Eastman in March 1969, but before that he popped the question in Portugal in December 1968. He felt – on the heels of extended time together that fall in New York and Scotland – they did know each other better.

Here’s Paul, as quoted in 1997’s Many Years From Now:

As our relationship solidified and we really started to feel very confident with each other, it was a question of ‘Well, shall I get off the pill then?’ And we talked about that, and I said, ‘Yeah!’ I don’t know why. It wasn’t like planning a family, it was more ‘If you like. We could see what happened. If anything happened. That would be all right.’ Then Mary was on the way, it was definitely not planned. And we decided, round about that point, to get married.

This trip to Portugal with Linda and her daughter, Heather– December 11 was their first full day there — was precisely that point.

21 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

A thousand miles separated Paul McCartney and John Lennon on December 12, 1968, yet the Beatles remained entwined in spirit, meeting the press and teasing a glimpse at the project they shared on the horizon.

On holiday: Hunter Davies, Linda Eastman, Paul McCartney and Margaret Forster with children Jake Davies, Heather Eastman and Caitlin Davies.

Paul, girlfriend Linda Eastman and her daughter, Heather, vacationed for several days in Portugal in mid-December 1968 – contemporary reports put it at eight days, while host Hunter Davies maintained it lasted two weeks in later accounts. The January 1969 Beatles Book magazine said it was just a week, and that’s what I’m leaning toward myself for reasons that I’ll make clear when we get there.

It didn’t take long for locals to catch wind that a Beatle was there on holiday — even with his late-night arrival on December 10 and access to private lodging. As Davies related in his 2006 book “The Beatles, Football and Me,” upon landing at the airport, Paul asked someone “official looking” to exchange £50 to Portuguese escudo, but Macca grabbed a cab before getting the currency back.

“A story had gone round about this idiot Englishman giving money away,” Davies wrote. “Then one person had said, ‘Oh no, I recognized him, he’s not an idiot, he’s a Beatle.’”

Tell me to press: Paul chats up local media in Hunter Davies’ home movies

And so the Beatle was out of the bag. It was around that point, on his third day in Portugal, Paul called on the media to make a deal. Per Davies, the Beatle offered to meet reporters one time in exchange for privacy for the rest of his vacation.  Common wisdom holds this small, informal press conference happened on December 12, because it’s mentioned in newspapers dated the following day, and because Davies later wrote it happened on Paul’s third day in Portugal. But like many other events in this period, we’re going with educated guesses.

Paul held court on the private beach attached to Davies’ home. Photographic and film evidence of the meeting survived. What doesn’t seem to be circulating is a decent scan of any news coverage that emerged from the interviews. If one surfaces before I make it to a library in Portugal, please let me know!

The best we seem to have is the above scan from page 11 of the December 13 issue of Portuguese daily Diário Popular. If you’re one of the proud few who have studied Paul’s ’68 vacation to Portugal to any degree, you’ve probably seen this page.  It’s clear enough to make out headlines and images, but most of the text is too fuzzy to get any decent read on what’s being discussed.

What we can make out (via Google Translate):

  • The photo’s caption is simply “Paul McCartney & Louise [sic] Eastman, photographed on Luz Beach.”
  • The box under the photo says: Paul McCartney speaks to << Diário Popular>> about his eventual marriage to photographer Linda Eastman.
  • The main headline reads: “Anything could happen …”
  • A subhed in the middle of the story says: “A new Beatles show on English TV.” Presumably this is Get Back-to-be.
  • There’s a reference to “was a fool on English TV.” Maybe it’s something about Magical Mystery Tour? Just a guess.
  • Hunter Davies and wife Margaret Forster earn a mention, and she’s named in reference to her popular novel, Georgy Girl.

Paul also wrote a greeting to the newspaper’s readers in English. Let’s note he represents his full group, not himself or even his family-to-be, inking “Love from the Beatles,” with a heart and arrow through it and his signature. On the other side of the page was a photo that looks like Paul sketching this very message. Again, Linda is named “Louise” in the caption. (When I worked at a newspaper, they would have skewered me if I got that sort of thing wrong so many times in one place.)

Never one to avoid his own media coverage, Paul was captured by Linda – that’s her name, I promise – checking out (we think) this December 13 issue of Diário Popular on the beach. You’ve seen it elsewhere on this blog, and now you’re going to see it again:

He read the news today, etc.

In 2006, Davies shared previously unseen footage at a book festival, just a few minutes of a short 8mm home movie of Paul, Linda and Heather along with his own family during the stay, including a moment from the above media meeting.

Davies recalled the media held their end of the bargain, but for the remainder of Paul’s stay businesses from nearby Lagos tried to lure him with tributes of flowers, fruit baskets and wine left at Davies’ home.

While Paul worked on ensuring the press stayed away from his temporary beachfront residence, John eagerly welcomed the media to his own home. Paul mentioned the possibility of an upcoming television show, but John actively performed for the cameras, including a tiny glimpse into Get Back sessions-to be.

We know Let It Be’s “I’ve Got a Feeling” pieced from two separate songs – Paul’s main section and John’s “Everybody Had a Hard Year.” John’s contribution was written and recorded prior to this date in late 1968, though it’s not clear precisely when. Musically, it’s quite nearly “Julia,” not just the distinctive fingerpicking style, but the guitar’s melody, too. This initial take uses the lyric “everyone” instead of “everybody.”

Promotional poster for the ORF broadcast of Film No. 6.

John revisited the song on this Thursday, singing a register lower and in harmony with Yoko. As opposed to the earlier version, we know everything about this one: It was filmed by an Austrian TV crew from public broadcaster ORF (Österreichischer Rundfunk) on the patio at John’s Kenwood estate on December 12, in color on a cloudy day, and later tacked onto the end of the March ’69 Austrian broadcast of the couple’s “Film No. 6 (Rape).” The camera pans across the estate to find John and Yoko seated on a white iron bench, both behatted and in black from head-to-ankles, with white footwear. John is playing acoustic guitar.

The lyrics remain a work-in-progress, but it’s the same gist later used by the Beatles. The song fades in, and you can hear John quickly say “again” as they restart:

Everybody had a hard year

Everybody had a good time

Everybody had a soft dream

Everybody saw the sun shine

Everybody had a hard year

John pauses, points to the camera, nearly touching the lens, and says: “Surprise, surprise”

Everybody had a hard year

Everybody had a good time

Everybody had a soft dream

Everybody saw the sun shine

Oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah, oh yeah

The fine line between this song and “Julia” blurs again, musically. And as quickly as the camera arrived, it pans away from the house and the clip ends.

Surprise, surprise

We can present this is as a tidy metaphor: The day after the Dirty Mac performance of a White Album track, John turned the page and now has his sights set on the next project, or at least on new material bouncing around his head. Perhaps he’s just realizing that as he interrupts himself after a verse: “Surprise, surprise.”

ORF moved operations inside the house, where Yoko hosted a tour of the in-home gallery while John occasionally played a funky little riff on the acoustic guitar. Some of this day’s footage was packaged as part of a documentary on John and Yoko that also aired in Austria in March 1969 (some clips ended up in the 1988 film Imagine: John Lennon as well as in the Beatles Anthology).

Included in the footage is a chess game between John and Yoko on an all-white chess set. “John has a marvelous sense of color and all that, he’s a very sensual artist,” Yoko explains. “I’m not particularly good in using color. White is just to say that you can color it and to say that you can imagine it. It doesn’t mean that I insist on white.”

Presenting items from her Half-a-Wind Show, Yoko invokes the other half of her sky: “A person is a half anyway. … My concept was maybe subconsciously, I was half a person without meeting John.”

Like a lot of events in this narrow period, there are conflicting reports on dates — I should have this disclaimer on every post, really. For instance, the book packaged with the 2021 Let It Be deluxe reissue dated the “Everybody Had a Hard Year” film clip to December 15, 1968. But that’s wrong. I’m trying to get these dates as accurate as they can be and correcting the record where it should be corrected (like the dates of Paul’s Portugal trip).

When it comes to all things John and Yoko, Lennonology is the essential reference, and I’m considering it the authority when there’s any conflict between dates. Co-author Chip Madinger confirmed to me the date of the December 12 filming – it was the second of a two-day visit by ORF, which also shot footage at the Rock and Roll Circus.  Likewise, the Internet (among others) wrongly attributes a series of interviews John and Yoko gave on December 14 to December 12. So that’s why I’m not writing about those interviews in this post. (And thanks for the help, Chip!)

In the wake of his divorce with Cynthia being finalized five weeks earlier, December 1968 would be near the end of John’s time at Kenwood. For at least the last week, newspapers reported he and Ringo Starr had both put their Weybridge estates up for sale. According to AP, John’s asking price was £40,000 (about $96,000), while Ringo sought £50,000 (about $120,000).

There was one other relevant news item involving John and Yoko on December 12. The Ministry of Health issued a statement defending John, who slept on the floor during Yoko’s stay in the hospital when she suffered a miscarriage weeks earlier.  In response to a complaint, the Ministry wrote, “Although routine visiting is generally channeled to regular times, when necessary prospective parents may be afforded the facility of remaining together when such a course is considered to be medically desirable.”

George Harrison remained under the radar at the start of December. The Quiet Beatle’s parents, ironically, made news for simply “living quietly.” Per a story in the December 12 Manchester Evening News, with the “hustle and bustle of ‘Beatlemania’ behind them, Louise and Harry Harrison “are seldom troubled by callers and receive only 500 letters a week.” Louise is three months behind, but still responds to all the fan mail.

20 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

Don’t say George Harrison didn’t warn everyone.

I won’t give away the ending to the story of the Hell’s Angels’ 1968 trip to Apple headquarters — you’ll see it at the end of the month — but if you’re reading this, you probably know it already.

The public never would have known at the time, but on December 4, 1968, George fired off a memo to “Everybody at Apple”:

Hells Angels will be in London within the next week, on the way to straighten out Czechoslovakia. There will be twelve in number complete with black leather jackets and motor cycles. They will undoubtedly arrive at Apple and I have heard they may try to make full use of Apple’s facilities. They may look as though they are going to do you in but are very straight and do good things, so don’t fear them or up-tight them. Try to assist them without neglecting your Apple business and without letting them take control of Savile Row.

A little more than a week later, it was the public’s turn to find out what exactly was going on. Ray Connolly, who so often covered the Beatles beat, shared the news in the December 13, 1968, Evening Standard under the simple headline, “Hells angels.”

Hells Angels, the Californian drop-out society of motor-cyclists, are hoping to extend their activities to Britain.

Two members of the Hells Angels are in London at the moment and have been given an office by the Beatles’ company, Apple. With them are several aspirant Angels and an underground pop group called the Grateful Dead.

To clarify, the Dead were actually in California at the time, but band manager Rock Scully was part of the “California Pleasure Crew” joining the Hell’s Angels in London.

In his 1995 memoir Living With the Dead – written with David Dalton, who co-authored the original Get Back book packaged with Let It Be in 1970 — Scully recounted George’s original invitation to the Hell’s Angels, which happened during the Beatle’s visit to San Francisco in 1967.

On Divisidero he runs into a couple of Hell’s Angels, Tumbleweed and Pete. Wow! Real sweaty, hairy, savage Hell’s Angels. The terror of the West. He’s impressed, all right. They’re impressed, too.

“Fuckin’ George Harrison, man!” In the heat of the moment George invites them to come and stay with him “whenever you’re in London, man.” You know, at George’s house! Now in England, this sort of invitation is taken for what it is: perfunctory politeness. Besides, he must have thought, when are two Hell’s Angels ever going to show up at Saville Row? But this is California, baby! The West—where a man’s word is a man’s word….

“Well, Jesus, George, that’s real decent of you. Real decent. We’ve been planning a trip to check out swingin’ London, haven’t we, Pete?” Pete is equally enthusiastic.

“Fuck, yeah! Hell, we’ll just bring the Harleys, it’ll be a hell of a time.” Whereupon George proceeds to hand them… his card. A bit formal, methinks, but the boys fall on it as if it were a fresh kilo of dope. They hand it around—to sniff, I presume—but on closer examination it turns out to be an Apple Records card. Oh well, he’s not actually going to give them his telephone number at Strawberry fucking Fields, now is he? I mean what if these guys actually do show up?

In time, the guys showed up, bankrolled by the Grateful Dead via Bill Graham.

The International Times reports on the Hell’s Angels’ arrival in England in its January 1-16, 1969 issue.

After arriving and sticking Apple with the air cargo cost of their motorcycles, the Hell’s Angels arrived at 3 Savile Row the next day.

“House hippie” Richard DiLello’s account in 1972’s The Longest Cocktail Party probably stands as the definitive account of this era. It’s a breezy, must-read, so do so if you haven’t already. Here’s how he described the Hell’s Angels’ arrival:

In actual fact, the anticipated, 12-strong army of leather and chains that was on its way to Czechoslovakia to straighten out the explosive and highly degenerate political situation had somehow been watered down to two genuine, dyed-in-the-Levis Hell’s Angels and 16 California freaks: zonked, wired, and suffering from massive time displacement and cultural shock. The two Hell’s Angels were Billy Tumbleweed and Frisco Pete of the San Francisco chapter of the Hell’s Angels Motorcycle Club, California, USA.

Apple office secretary Chris O’Dell dedicated a short chapter of her 2009 autobiography Miss O’Dell to the Hell’s Angels visit. Like any good host, the first thing Apple supplied was beer, and figurative keys to the building. From Miss O’Dell:

Sufficiently juiced, the Angels started casing the joint, peeking behind doors, opening closets, running up and down the stairs, playing with the elevator, and before long they found their way up to my office on the fifth floor.

So why did the Hell’s Angels really come to London? It depends on when you asked. Per Ray Connolly’s December 13 report, Frisco Pete (Pete Knell) said the plan was to “arrange a party or a dance here for about 50 to 100 of our members.”

In the January 4, 1969, issue of DISC and Music Echo, however – and by this point they had been thrown out of Apple — an unnamed Angel sounded a more ominous tone.

“They were, they said, worried about the power the Beatles had and exactly how they are going to use their influence over the world,” according to the story.

But here on our timeline, it’s only December 13. We’ll hear more from the Hell’s Angels again before the end of the month.

(It’s worth marking that at the exact same time all of this was happening at Apple, three chapters of the Redditch Hell’s Angels lived in the basement at Rutle Corps.)

The Hell’s Angels weren’t quite to Czechoslovakia yet, but Paul McCartney’s Continental adventure continued. At this point, we know some of what he did on his Portuguese holiday, but we don’t necessarily know when.

Paul’s brother Mike (aka Mike McGear of the Scaffold) and wife, Angela, were expecting their first child imminently back in England. Paul picked up some practice on how to be Fun Uncle with Hunter Davies’ kids, doing things like letting 4 ½-year-old Caitlin sit on the Beatles’ knee and steer the car, according to the writer’s memoir “The Beatles, Football and Me.”

“He would also let Jake play with a kitchen knife,” Davies wrote, “refusing to take it off him, saying he would learn it was sharp when he cut himself.”

Paul, with Heather Eastman and Caitlin Davies. Portugal, December 1968.

That’s just the sort of Beatle behavior the headmaster of Clark’s Grammar School in Guildford was afraid of, as published in the December 13 issue of the Surrey Advertiser. Col. A. C. M. Rowlands was up to here with the Fab Four, and let the parents at the school know about it at the annual speech day.

Here’s what the headmaster had to say, under the headline “Homework more important than the Beatles”:

“One understands the attraction to the young of the Beatles and other so-called pop groups when their performance comes just at the time your sons and daughters should be doing their biology or mathematics homework.

“But in these two particular contexts you can, instead, guide your child’s mind along the channels that firstly, a beatle, in biological language, is really a Coleoptera — it’s only similarity to the aforementioned individuals perhaps being that it also is regarded by some as a pest.

“And that, secondly, as far as mathematics is concerned, the Beatles’ theories on ‘All our loving’ are of far less importance than Pythagoras’s theory of “The Square on the Hypotenuse” — even if, in giving this parental guidance, you risk being regarded temporarily as the very personification of that square.”

Lads: As pictured in the December 13 edition of the Stoke-on-Trent Evening Sentinel.

In some schools, the Beatles could still be role models.

19 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

John Riley is the star of the biggest Beatles-related dentist story, which happened in 1965. Riley covertly dosed coffee with LSD sending dental patients George Harrison and Pattie Boyd as well as John and Cynthia Lennon on their first trip. Riley went down in history as that “wicked dentist,” in George’s words.

Then there was the “Gordon the Irish dentist,” who was anything but wicked when a Beatle and friends spontaneously visited a small town in Bedfordshire. The genial bearded dentist welcomed Paul McCartney, plus Apple execs Derek Taylor, Peter Asher, Tony Bramwell and reporter Alan Smith into his home in Harrold one June day in 1968, serving his surprise guests “hams and pies and multi- jewelled salads, new bread and cakes, chicken and fruit and wine” (by Taylor’s account in “As Time Goes By”).

None of this is to say Dr. Anthony Halperin wasn’t an interesting figure. It’s just his brush with Beatles history was less about him and more about his space.

Yoko Ono is interviewed by Dutch television in a dentist’s waiting room on December 14, 1969. Photo by Susan Wood.

And that brings us to December 14, 1968, when John Lennon had a bridge replaced in Dr. Halperin’s dental chair in Knightsbridge. The real action was in the waiting room, though, where Yoko Ono hosted a true multimedia event: a longform conversation filmed for television which largely doubled as a magazine interview for a separate publication and a photo session for a third media outlet.

As I mentioned earlier in a separate entry, this dentist office interview has often been misattributed to December 12. John could be a little crazy, but he’s probably not “stay at the Rock and Roll Circus until 5 a.m. and then have non-emergency dental work a few hours later” crazy.

We’re lucky to have like the entirety of the interview for the Dutch VARA-TV program “Rood Wit Blauw” (Red White Blue), as conducted by sociologist Abram de Swaan online.

(This YouTube clip is shorter than the audio, and mostly overlaps with the final segment)

While John was undergoing the procedure, Yoko owned the stage by herself  and early in the interview defined herself.

I’ve always been a freak, in a sense that even now in newspapers, they don’t know what to call, what to say about me. So they sometimes say, well, a Japanese actress, Yoko Ono, or a film producer, or a composer, or a painter, anything they say. But it’s very difficult to label a person, and nowadays, art is so complex that you can’t label somebody really …

Have you ever tried your hand at describing yourself, somehow labeling yourself, like a bottle sticking a label on itself?

I never bothered to. So I always say, whatever people think, whatever you think, is me. And that’s true.

But you see, in my field, my own field, which is art, I was always considered somebody who is a little bit out of the group, out of everything. So that they didn’t know how to label me, you know.

The painter said, well, she’s not really a painter. And the composer said, no, she’s not really a composer.

So I was always out of the circle by trying to, sort of deal with the future and all that. And John was always doing that too, you see.

The segment touched on Two Virgins, recapped the couple’s origin story, the butterfly effect, nudity and the nature of her art.

It’s not the age of professionalism. And the reason why I’m doing these things in my work, all my paintings and all my sculptures are unfinished. And the Two Virgins record is called Unfinished Music, you see. And that is because I want people to finish it or go on adding something to it, so the piece will always go on growing, you know.

John joined a little more than halfway through the interview, “out of [my] skull, out of [my] mind” from the dentist’s anesthesia — at least he knew he was being drugged this time. As described in the March 1969 Nova:

A small ripple passed over us when a third assistant came out of the surgery to announce that “John’s bridge fits perfectly,” but it seemed to be more professional excitement than anything else. “What a miracle that bridge fits” one white-coated girl said to me. “He’s always cancelling his appointments and teeth shift with time, you know.”

Nova further described the shift at John’s arrival:

The microphone approached like an ice-lolly, the Look photographer, having stood in every possible corner of the room, now climbed on a table; and suddenly the door opened and all eyes, all machinery, all attention flew to John Lennon.

As soon as John entered the room, Yoko’s lacy self-confidence was replaced by a shy, maternal attitude, she seemed to defer to John who was talking rapidly, to beam upon him; and I realised, heaven help me, that this was going to be a love story.

There seems to be a pact between John and Yoko, probably instinctive and unspoken, that when the conversation is about art and the arts Yoko is set loose like a pretty moth; anything else, taxes, politics, police raids, is John’s province.”

The topic shortly went to their recent drug bust at some length (“we were lying in bed feeling very clean and drugless”) before an involved discussion of taxes and materialism and prejudice. That last topic led to a some provocative quotes from John and Yoko, especially read in 2023. It also was the first public mention of a phrase that would later serve as the title of a controversial 1972 single.

John: I believe in reincarnation, right? So that’s one thing that helps me in an overall view of things. I believe that I’ve probably been black, I’ve probably been Jewish, I’ve probably been female, I’ve probably been a tree or anything. And that helps a lot. So a lot of sort of intellectual reincarnation.

But even so, you can make it, you know, it might be tougher physically and materialistically to make it being black and that. But you can make it, you know. And I sympathize, and I think it’s terrible.  I believe it should be smashed one way or another, people’s prejudice, but they won’t change it really by violence. Okay, so the black power scene, you know, good luck to it, because at least it’s frightening them. It might frighten them enough to kill them and have a real war.

OK, so then if the blacks took over, all well and good, but all the blacks aren’t saints. You know, it’s going to be the same scene, just a different version.

Yoko: For instance, I believe that the situation of the women in the world is today, it’s like a woman is like the nigger of the world. And so that’s why we understand about the nigger problem very much.

For a bit of context, the interview aired on Dutch TV on January 15, 1969 – right as the Get Back sessions were reaching a standstill. The Nova interview was in the March 1969 issue, and the photos from Look appeared in its March 18, 1969 edition. Either the Austrian television crew from the other day was still lingering or they managed to get their hands on the Dutch footage, but some of the dentist waiting room film made it into their documentary, too.

John and Yoko hold court in the waiting room of his dentist. Photo by Susan Wood.

One easter egg from the footage and Look’s photos: John wears the same shirt to the dentist as he does to rehearse and record during Get Back (and record “Hey Jude”).

But on December 14, 1968, as far as the public was concerned, the next Beatles project was an imminent concert.

By this point, it was no longer will the Beatles stage a live concert, just when and where. We learn in the Let It Be/Get Back experience that these questions weren’t so easily answered and went down to the last moment. By mid-December we knew the show would end up in the new year, and as far as venue, it wouldn’t be London’s Roundhouse.

The December 14 DISC and Music Echo reported another possibility that the Beatles touched on and mooted during the Get Back sessions, perhaps the venue they knew best of all: Liverpool’s Cavern Club. This grew out of what was probably a late October visit by Paul to the Beatles’ old haunt.

When Paul McCartney made a nostalgic visit to his hometown recently he expressed a strong desire to appear there again with John, George and Ringo.

Said club’s owner, Alf Geoghan, to whom Paul spoke: “He didn’t definitely state that they would come. But he did express a desire to play again.

“He seemed quite delighted to find the place comparatively unchanged. He says he expected padded walls and Japanese waitresses!”

Paul spent two hours at the Club, according to the story, which closed with a characteristic give-every-answer-at-once reply from Apple publicist Derek Taylor:

“The idea of the Beatles playing the ‘Cavern’ again isn’t as bizarre as it seems. We won’t say POSSIBLY or PROBABLY. But it’s very attractive.”

Meanwhile, Melody Maker speculated on another rumor that never came close to coming true, writing in its December 14 edition that Andy Williams could be a guest on an upcoming Beatles special, which they pinned down with a January 18, 1969, date. This came on the heels of the American crooner meeting with both Paul and George during the course of 1968.

“Nothing was definitely arranged,” Taylor told Melody Maker. “But Andy would like the Beatles to do a guest spot on his show, and he may in turn appear on the Beatles show.”

Both the Cavern and Andy Williams speculation were laid to rest at by the end of the month, when the January Beatles Book magazine hit mailboxes, saying “Rumours that the programme might be made in Liverpool instead of London have been denied. So has the idea that Andy Williams, who lunched with Apple executives a few weeks ago, might make a guest appearance in the show.

While talk of a live Beatles show ran rampant, a new theory emerged that they had another studio release besides the White Album already in stores. From the appropriately labeled “RUMORS” column in DISC and Music Echo:

That unknown group, the Moles – whose “We Are the Moles” getting a lot of airplay – is really Beatles in disguise. Anonymous caller summoned by DJ Stuart Henry to London’s Hyde Park offering exclusive interview. Says Stuart: “I was met in a taxi by a person dressed from head-to-toe in black. He even had a hood on. I’m not convinced – but it could have been John Lennon. The record certainly sounds like the Beatles.”

The Moles never actually charted with “We Are The Moles,” which was released in mid-November 1968. Of course, they also weren’t the Beatles, but instead were British psychedelic pop band Simon Dupree and the Big Sound in disguise. Shortly after this entry in DISC, the cat was let out of the bag by none other than Syd Barrett.

Here’s how it all went down, according to a recent interview with Derek Shulman, who was the lead singer of (and would later help form) Gentle Giant:

We didn’t know that in the studio at that time, Syd Barrett, Pink Floyd were recording as well. And when the buzz started to happen and people were saying, ‘Wow, it’s a Beatles song, they want to call themselves the Moles, we got to buy this.’ Syd did a big interview saying, ‘No, it’s not the Beatles, it’s the shitty band Simon Dupree, so he blew the whistle on us.

As the Moles stalled on the charts in emulating the Beatles, it was really enough to simply cover them, and one song in particular.  No fewer than The Bedrocks, Joyce Bond, Chris Shakespeare Globe Show, Arthur Conley, Marmalade and Spectrum all had covers of “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” on the market (and of course, the Beatles’ own version LP-only in the UK and US). Paul later revealed the Bedrocks’ version was his favorite during a January 13, 1969, conversation at Twickenham.

The early winner in the “Ob-La-Di” sweeps was Marmalade, who entered the charts at No. 22. A lengthy feature in New Musical Express spotlighted the band as they began a journey that would lead to an eventual UK No. 1.

Whether it was an imposter like the Moles, or imitators covering Beatles tracks, nothing beat the real thing. In the December 14, 1968, issue of Billboard, Capital Records said the White Album was in line to become their biggest record in the label’s history. After just one week, dealer orders already stood at 1.9 million while over-the-counter sales totaled 1.1 million.

This kind of success would help subsidize a new experimental label publishing budget-priced LPs featuring “talk, poetry and music especially designed for the college market,” as Billboard described a what would become Zapple, a few pages later in the same issue.

And that takes us back to John Lennon. If you thought bridge work was a pain, try selling a record with a naked photo of you and your girlfriend. Another Billboard article laid out the situation with Two Virgins and American music store chains. While distributor Tetragrammaton planned packaging that would obscure the cover’s nudity, five stores flat-out refused to sell the LP: Sears, White Front, May Co., Broadway and Wallichs Music City.

“We don’t carry any product that might harm our reputation as a family store,” Sears said in a statement, and Billboard added the company probably wouldn’t change its policy even with new, more modest packaging.

In denying sales of the LP, a May Co. representative said: “While it’s not our job to act as a public censor, I feel sensationalism and liberalism can go too far.”

One chain, though saying they wouldn’t sell the record with the nude cover in its “raw state,” committed to selling the LP, and gave the right reason.

“An artist of John Lennon’s stature is too important not to be heard,” said a merchandise manager from Korvette’s. “Appropriate arrangements are being made to handle the LP and still not offend our family trade.”

18 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

Several recollections and artifacts of Paul McCartney’s December 1968 trip to Portugal exist today, but one thing we lack is a clear timeline of his day-to-day activities. There’s no diary, no printed itinerary. We do know the kinds of things he did – spending time at the beach, visiting local towns, hiking in the mountains. It’s mostly based on Linda Eastman’s photographs or Hunter Davies’ written memoirs.

The most enduring document of the trip is a song. “Penina” wasn’t the first song with a “McCartney”-only songwriting credit – the ’67 Family Way soundtrack holds that distinction – and it was never formally recorded by Paul or the Beatles. But “Penina” is one of the few tangible things sprouting from the trip, between several recorded versions by a variety of acts, a newspaper story about the Paul giving a song away as “a £20,000 holiday tip” and a resultant, ragged performance of the song during the Get Back sessions.

I’ve written up the origin story of “Penina” at some length before, but let’s quickly recap the basics: One late night during his Portuguese holiday, Paul showed up drunk (by his own account) at a hotel in Alvor, reportedly to exchange some currency. The house band, Jotta Herre, was performing at the hotel bar in the early hours, and Paul accepted an invite to hop on stage. Here’s Paul’s account of what happened next, as he told the other Beatles on January 9, 1969:

And I sat in on drums, and they said, ‘Give us a song.’ So I said, OK.

[Singing] I’ve been to Albufera, had a great time there

It was called La Penina, the hotel. And they were all digging it and singing along, and it was good.

The January 9, 1969, Daily Express story, which first mentioned “Penina” to the public, quoted Beatles publicist Derek Taylor downplaying Paul’s gift of music, saying “this was not a whole song he gave to the bandleader. It was more a rif.”

But, as the paper continued:

Northern Songs shareholders in fact are presently benefiting from a rif, “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da,” John Lennon and Paul McCartney borrowed – from another performer, Jimmy Scott.

Paul was furious in reading that January 9 report, saying his offering of “Penina” as a throwaway was no different than his reception and reinterpretation of Scott’s phrase.

“You haven’t got a riff when you say ‘hello,’” Paul said to the other Beatles. “That’s the riff I got off of Jimmy Scott, those two words (“Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da”). You’d think I’d taken his life. It’s not as though he wrote the song.”

We don’t know precisely when the “Penina” performance occurred. There isn’t any audio or photographic evidence. In 2021, the hotel offered a reward of a three-night’s stay to the best photo submitted of Paul performing there, but as far as I can tell, no one ever cashed in the reward. Maybe there’s a snapshot somewhere in Linda’s archives.

For the purposes of getting the “Penina” night on my December 1968 agenda, I’m placing it here, on December 15, perhaps selfishly for my own narrative purposes. I’m in no way proving or definitively saying that this is when it happened. But it’s as good a guess as any barring any proof to the contrary. This would have been the early hours as Saturday night becomes Sunday morning (not that days of the week matter much when you’re on holiday), and it’s certainly feasible.

Again, you can read a fuller account of the “Penina” origin story here.

Now let’s tie “Penina” back to “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” again, this time to help clear up some myths about the latter.

The song was sneaking up the singles chart in the UK, not by the Beatles, but releases from six artists clamoring for the top spot. Marmalade had the inside track – see yesterday’s entry for more on that.

On this December 15, 1968, Jimmy Scott earned a small feature in the Sunday People newspaper. This obscure interview presents several insights that challenge today’s established wisdom about “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da.” But first, a little of what we’ve been led to believe. Stick with me, I’ll get back to this interview, and December 15, 1968, soon.

I’m going to point to the song’s Wikipedia page as published mid-December 2023 because it’s the easiest target to pick on, the top Google search result and presumably the most viewed online resource on the song’s development.  But it, the sources it cites and all the websites and publications that repeat this information are incorrect on a few relatively key facts. This isn’t the same as being off a day or two on something.  From Wikipedia:

After the release of “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” in November 1968, Scott tried to claim a writer’s credit for the use of his catchphrase.[15][6] McCartney said that the phrase was “just an expression”, whereas Scott argued that it was not a common expression and was used exclusively by the Scott-Emuakpor family.[12] …

Later in 1969, while in Brixton Prison awaiting trial for failing to pay maintenance to his ex-wife, Scott sent a request to the Beatles asking them to pay his legal bills. McCartney agreed to pay the amount on the condition that Scott abandon his attempt to receive a co-writer’s credit.[18]

Now let’s get into what Scott said in the December 15, 1968, Sunday People interview, as reprinted above, here with my emphasis:

POP MUSICIAN Jimmy Scott told yesterday how a catch-phrase and a Beatle’s generosity saved him from a long term in prison.

Jimmy, who used to play the conga drums with Georgie Fame, was jailed for failing to pay maintenance to his wife. If he could find the £139 he owed he would go free.

He had served a week in jail when Beatle Paul McCartney heard of his plight — and paid off the £139.

And one of the reasons for Paul’s action is that Jimmy inspired the song ” Ob-la-di, Ob-la-da,” the biggest hit on the Beatles’ new album.

For years, 38-year-old Jimmy would say farewell to his friends with the phrase: “Ob-la-di, Ob-la-da – life must go on, bra.”

Explained Jimmy: “Ob-la-di is a word I made up from Afrikaans and I’ve used it for nearly 10 years. “Paul asked me if he could use Ob-la-di as the basis of a song for his new album. “He has written a completely new melody and all the words are different—except those seven in my farewell phrase.

“I agreed he could use the words and he invited me to the recording studio to listen to  the song. Then I gave him the correct spelling of the title.”

Said Jimmy: “He has never asked for any of the money back.”

This contemporary account exposes a few key issues with the accepted knowledge surrounding Scott’s relationship to the song. While we know Scott complained about credit for “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” — Paul mentions it on several occasions in the January 1969 Nagra tapes — in December 1968 Scott himself admits the quid pro quo. Paul made the deal — charity, perhaps — before the song’s release and success.

(Jimmy Scott plays conga drums on an early take of “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da”)

Your mileage may vary on where you draw the line on cultural appropriation, but there’s a big difference between Paul using a phrase that was part of Scott’s Nigerian family heritage and a word Scott admitted he “made up” and used for only the last decade.

Paul gets a little bit into the agreement with Scott in 1997’s Many Years From Now (as later reprinted in the book packaged with the 2018 White Album deluxe reissue):

He was a great guy anyway and I said to him, “I really like that expression and I’m thinking of using it,” and I sent him a cheque in recognition of that fact later because even though I had written the whole song and he didn’t help me, it was his expression.

That memory seems in line with Scott’s interview published December 15, 1968.

***

It was front-page news the next day. Celebrity lawyer David Jacobs, 56, was found dead, hanging in his garage at 4:30 p.m. at his Sussex home on Sunday, December 15. News reports said he was recently in ill health and had suffered a nervous breakdown.

Jacobs was the lawyer for Beatles manager Brian Epstein, and while not necessarily a villain in their story,  to a large degree he earned responsibility for the horrendous merchandise deal the Beatles were signed to at the height of Beatlemania.

At this point, the death was a mystery but police said they did not suspect foul play.

Sir Laurence Olivier, Judy Garland, Marlene Dietrich, Shirley Bassey, Donovan and Liberace counted among what the Daily Mirror said were his 5,000 clients. “He was the lawyer for almost every big pop group in the country,” according to the paper.

Jacobs was a celebrity lawyer, and a lawyer that was a celebrity. A piece in the December 16 Evening Standard elaborated:

David Jacobs was one of the very few non-political British lawyers to achieve fame in his own right. His services, for any pop star or actor in trouble, were de rigueur.

During a decade in which lawyers tentatively emerged from anonymity, David Jacobs stood out as a rare, exquisite (a colleague’s adjective) public advocate, one who was subject to the same prominence as his clients. He was therefore exposed to the same sour grapes, the same skepticism, as well as the same glamour.

Even with his role in costing the Beatles millions and millions of dollars, the Beatles maintained a friendly relationship with Jacobs. Ringo Starr honeymooned with Maureen at Jacobs’ house — the same one the lawyer was found dead in — in 1965.

On the news of Jacobs’ death, the Beatles issued a statement: “He was a great friend to all the Beatles and of course, to Brian. He was always there when he wanted him. He was a very steadfast man.”

17 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

Last week had been a doozy for John Lennon and Yoko Ono, busy with added crazy: rehearsals then a return to the stage at the Rock and Roll Circus, a late-night radio appearance, multiple interviews at a dentist’s office on the heels of bridge work for the Beatle. Plus the couple had brief custody of young 5-year-old Julian, while his mom was on a vacation with her significant other.

John and Yoko at home, December 16, 1968. (Photo by Susan Wood)

December 16, 1968, was a Monday, and a good day to stay in. But a Beatle’s work is never done.

Nova writer Irma Kurtz spent the day at John’s Weybridge estate – she wrote his “castle is protected by nothing more menacing than a sign, and it could be called significant, which says: ‘Children Playing’” —   wrapping up reporting she began two days earlier at the dentist’s office. These interviews would eventually be published the following March.

John and Yoko continued to be in promotional mode taking the interview at their home, but after a week of so much hustle, we can revel in this documentation of the mundane.

For instance, these were crazy cat people, owners of “eight beautiful cats who warm themselves at the cooker between getting pregnant and, unlike the rest of their household, being carnivorous.”

Yoko worked in the kitchen, slicing leeks “with the artistry of a sea-cook,” tossing the vegetable in butter.

‘I feel that I’m getting younger. Even physically. It is partly the diet because, you see, you are what you eat,’ she said with a confidence that would astonish a biologist. ‘And it is also the fact that I have met John. This year has been hard.’

Maybe with the couple working at such a high velocity, thoughts of slowing down easily took hold.

‘We’re looking forward to our retirement,’ John said, stretching his tennis shoes toward the fire. ‘Having created everything we want, we’ll just settle down on a farm maybe. I don’t know if we’ll actually farm.’ added the practical man.

‘I’m still hung up on work; I can’t help working,’ Yoko said. ‘That’s beautiful, but’ she added with one of those butterfly leaps so difficult to make coherent, ‘if I get over it, it will be better. All this hassle! Then we’ll just be together,’ said the romantic from the East.

Yoko touched on the lows of the past year, specifically the recent drug bust and miscarriage.

“But it is like a game,” Yoko said. “Everything is like a game if there is somebody else, and now I have John.”

John, Julian and one of Julian’s friends enjoy the afternoon at home on December 16, 1968. (Photo by Bob Thomas)

And for this brief period, Yoko and John had Julian, in what probably was the last week he got to spend in the house he was first raised in.

We’re blessed not only with descriptions and quotes from this day, but also photographs courtesy of Susan Wood and Bob Thomas. Just like he did during the Get Back sessions, John opted to wear “continuity clothes,” the same beautiful, and questionably laundered rainbow shirt he had on at the dentist’s office 48 hours earlier.

John and Yoko in the home gallery, on December 16, 1968. (Photo by Susan Wood)

John is captured in one photo with a newspaper, a treasure to a researcher hoping to confirm a date.

John, Yoko and the Guardian, December 16, 1968. (Photo by Bob Thomas)

For reference, here’s the front page, above the fold, of the Guardian that’s on John’s table.

The couple went outside for additional photos with John’s Rolls Royce and big, black hats, as one does.

About 1,500 miles away, Paul McCartney was near the end of a holiday in Portugal. Like John, he performed in the past few days, too – but Paul created a circus of his own, drunk at a hotel bar with not a single camera or recording device in sight (see the last entry, on “Penina”). Paul spent a week deliberately avoiding the media.

He spent time at the beach, as documented by Linda Eastman and probably first seen by the public in the gatefold of the McCartney LP. All of these subsequent photos aren’t specifically dated, but fall within this week.

(Photo by Linda Eastman)

We also know he went sightseeing, shopping, outdoor pursuits — that is, the normal things you do on holiday.

Paul, who hates socks, tries to take a photograph despite Heather Eastman’s objections, as Caitlin Davies looks on. Portugal, December 1968.

Paul, Heather and a couple donkeys. Portugal, December 1968.

It wasn’t entirely play for Paul. According to Hunter Davies, and as recollected in his memoir “The Beatles, Football and Me,” Paul began writing a novel.

He borrowed my typewriter, when I wasn’t using it. I did try to sneak a read at the odd page, behind his back, but didn’t manage it. (I have asked since about his aspirations to write a novel, as he has now done a book of poems. He says he has completed a work of fiction, but it’s locked in a safe while he decides whether to have it published or not).

When Paul vacationed in Portugal in 1965, he forgot his guitar. Not so this time.

“In odd moments, including going to the lavatory, we could hear him playing away,” Davies wrote.

16 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

We’re not entirely sure when Paul McCartney truly concluded his holiday in Portugal, but December 17, 1968, is my best guess.

Paul McCartney. Portugal, December 1968 (Photo by Linda Eastman)

Hunter Davies, who played host to Paul, Linda and Heather Eastman, wrote decades later that his guests stayed two weeks. Contemporary press published the day after Paul arrived said they planned an eight-day stay, while the January Beatles Book magazine said he was away for a week. Depending on whether you count his late-night arrival as a day or not, December 17 would either be the seven- or eight-day mark. Maybe he left the next morning. The calculation is vague enough to work.

There’s more definitive evidence Paul journeyed to the post office this Tuesday – or at least visited a collection box — dropping a pair of postcards in the mail.

The cards shared two identical features: Both were embossed with a “17.12.68 LAGOS” postmark over the stamp, and each card featured a hand-drawn candlestick in black ink on the left side.

One card was sent to the Starkeys – “Ringo/Mo/Jr./Jr.” at “Brookfields, Cut (the wise cracks) Mill Lane, Elstead Surrey Worry.” Still, the postcard reached them just fine. Decades later, when it was reprinted in his book Postcards From the Boys, Ringo added the caption: “From Paul and Linda. Nice picture! Those guys had a lot of holidays!”

Paul sent Hunter Davies a similar postcard, though the images on the front must have been different since the back had different photo credits. In addition to the candlestick, Paul added “Thank you.” Davies’ address was written properly except for Paul added “of course” after “Portugal.”

The postcard offering thanks to his host is exactly why I think this day marked the end of Paul’s trip.

Paul’s postcard wouldn’t have reached Ringo for several days yet, but December 17 was a milestone day for the drummer. Ringo wasn’t in attendance for the black-tie affair at the Astor Theater in New York, but on this date, “Candy” – which featured his first acting role outside of a Beatles movie – enjoyed its world premiere about a year after his part was filmed.

The gist of contemporary reviews was that “Candy” was essentially a farcical stag film with an all-star cast. Ringo’s role was small – Emmanuel the Mexican gardener – but his own star(r) was big enough the studio marketed off his name (in addition to the others).

A lobby card for “Candy” featuring Ringo and star Ewa Aulin.

On January 13, 1969, while waiting for the others to arrive at Twickenham, Ringo spoke at some length with Michael Lindsay-Hogg about his experience filming “Candy.” At one point, Michael asked Ringo if he preferred drumming to acting.

Ringo: Well, it’s hard to say, doing so little movies and such a lot of the drums. “Help!” and “A Hard Day’s Night” was all right because its the four of us and we played, and did it. The only trouble with those [was] when I didn’t know what I was doing. … So I did ‘Candy’, which was only two weeks — which was great because I have to do something. …

I thought it came out very well. …

MLH: Did [director Christian Marquand] help you?

Ringo: No, I didn’t feel he really helped me. I thought I found I played it after reading the book how I thought he should be. And that’s the only disappointing thing. Because if you haven’t read the book, when I watched it, I played it all sort of nervous and shaky, because in the book the gardener is terrified. But in the film it just looked a bit strange where I come in all shaky and nervous. If you haven’t read the book you don’t know why.

[I had a] Mexican [accent], which I’ve lost now, because I’m not very good at accents. And we have to have this coach there, kept telling me to speak like a Mexican, and there was a Mexican guy there to help me.

That conversation soon steered to his next film project, another Terry Southern book adaptation: The Magic Christian.

Ringo’s reputation as an actor already had some traction, certainly by comparison to another certain Beatle. Don’t expect any scripts waiting for you at home, Paul.

From Sheilah Graham’s syndicated gossip column “Movie Gadabout’s Diary,” as published on December 17:

Paul McCartney, the most popular of the Beatles, according to a recent British poll [on December 10], is the best singer but the worst actor in the quartet. Which perhaps explains why he has not received offers to work solo in pictures, a la Ringo and John Lennon.

15 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

It was the dawn of Bagism.

The Royal Albert Hall played host to the Alchemical Wedding, a benefit for the Drury Lane Arts Lab, a multimedia exhibition space for alternative arts. ­

The back page of the December 13, 1968, International Times.

Somewhere between 600 and 3,000 people (contemporary accounts vary widely) reportedly attended the “Celebration in December – A Community Event” – which sounds more like a Christmas tree lighting in the suburbs than the event that took place.

David Mairowitz set the scene in the January 1, 1969, issue of International Times :

So the Albert Hall was booked, thousands arrived, not one with a clue as to the evening’s events. There were rumours of Leonard Cohen, the Beatles, the Stones showing … Such promises of glory.

There was, however, one Beatle in attendance. We’ll get to him soon.

The event presented several acts on stage: poets, Hare Krishna chanting, musicians.

Hey, John Lennon is a musician, and he was there!

This is true. But even before John took the stage, the big news coming out of the evening unfolded not on stage but in the audience. Remember a week earlier, when John and Yoko Ono appeared on BBC, and in promoting this event, Yoko said “go naked”? (See the December 11 entry.)

From the front page of the December 19, 1968, Daily Mirror, under the headline “The girl who stripped off at the Albert Hall:  Police called to a ‘happening’ in the audience”:

Blonde Elizabeth Marsh sits serenely in the audience at the Royal Albert Hall … without a stitch on.

She stripped off her ankle-length black dress last night when Indian music was played during a “hippy happening” at the hall called “An Alchemical Wedding.”

Then 24-year-old Elizabeth, from Texas, sat completely naked in the third row while hall official pleaded with her to get dressed.

But some of the 600-strong audience formed a human shield around Elizabeth – and started to take their clothes off as well.

A UPI wire story published two days later fleshed things out further:

“It was the funniest thing you ever saw,” said Jack Henry Moore, of Sulphur, Okla., co-director of the art theater group which sponsored the happening …

Moore said at least 50 men and at least one woman had taken off all their clothes above the waist by this point to show their solidarity with Miss Marsh.

[Co-director Jim] Haynes, of Haynesville, La., said Miss Marsh’s “thing” was one of the high points of his $2.80 a ticket “happening” staged to raise funds for his Art Laboratory Theater.

“I don’t know why I did it, but there were good reasons at the time,” [Marsh] said.

This offstage act served as an opener for who would serve as the headliners: John and Yoko. But there was no poetry, no music. And if you wanted to see these two naked, you had to go to the record store.

John and Yoko at the Royal Albert Hall, December 18, 1968.

The couple walked on stage and subsequently entered a white bag. And they were there, but gone, for a half-hour. Here’s a lengthy account from the January 1, 1969, International Times:

Finally, John Lennon and Yoko Ono came out in black robes and disappeared under a white-sheet sacking. Nothing happened. Simplicity was having its day. Another Void. Another filling up. Every fourth member of the audience had his say, a mass hysteria of John Lennon jokes. Then a lousy poet read some lousy poetry. In the midst of all this, the glorious moment of the evening occurred. Someone bound in a white sheet threw himself off the stage into the pit. Finally we were not being conned. It seemed a pure act of madness. It was savage tortured meat hurling itself among the vague love children transfixing each other on a spread of cloth. Perhaps. Only Perhaps.

John and Yoko emerged after about half an hour, fully clothed, again WE were the event. The lights came on, but then a specrte of fury and wrath poured down into the abyss. On its neck was an enormous hand-made sign saying The End of the World is at Hand for 7,000,000 people in Biafra. It approached, the symbol of the Death of the Evening, imploring John Lennon to cease his interest in making money and speak out on behalf of Biafrans. One’s first impression was it was part of the show. But no, such a military downer, it was unlikely. Rather the bloated conscience of England, hidden somewhere in the Victorian rafter of the Albert Hall, appeared as God from the Machine to bring the levity of England’s children to a halt. John Lennon was gone by then, but wouldn’t have replied anyway. And who could? One only wished the rock group called the Sun would come back immediately and ‘accompany’ his plea.

A flautist, Neil Oram, was on stage while John and Yoko were in the bag, and performed. As he recalled in Lennonology:

People were booing, and they were calling out for me to read and play my flute and read my poems. And after an half an hour, they were inside this fucking bag, then they got out to people booing them and everything and John Lennon was really pissed off. I don’t know why they turned up with such a boring stunt at such a fantastic event.”

I had no idea what they were up to, and then they got their bag out and got inside it.

Wire accounts said otherwise, that they “were applauded wildly” – but those same accounts said the audience stripped during John and Yoko’s performance, which is false.

John later spoke highly of the event. From a 1971 International Times story, via Lennonology:

It was all a beautiful thing, but very nerve wracking. I mean I was scared shitless going into a bag we couldn’t see out of. It was worse than singing, going on stage and doing that.”

Why get in a bag at all? When they more formally introduced Bagism as a concept the following March, they described it as an example of “total communication.”

Among the members of the audience counted the Hell’s Angels, who were still making Apple their temporary headquarters. (See the December 13 entry for more on their arrival.)

“We went to the Albert Hall where he got into the bag with that Oriental bird,” an unnamed Hell’s Angel told DISC and Music Echo, as reported in the January 4, 1969 issue. “What’s that all about, man? Does it mean he’s in his bag?”

Paul McCartney wasn’t at the Royal Albert Hall (as far as we know), but he certainly knew all about the bag. On January 10, 1969, during the Get Back sessions at Twickenham, he asked John about the logistics of Bagism.

“Can you see each other in the bag?” Paul asked the couple — seemingly apropos of nothing, at least on the tapes — during one of the day’s early takes of “I’ve Got a Feeling.”

“Yes,” John said, laughing. “We’re together in the bag.”

“I know, but can you see each other inside, when you’re in the bag?”

“It’s just like being under the sheets. … She generally used to use black bags where you could see out, but we couldn’t see a thing.”

Two pages into the same newspaper that buried John and Yoko’s performance in a story more about the naked American, the Daily Mirror touted another Beatle with a very high honor:

“RINGO STARR … THE SCREEN’S NEWEST ‘GREAT LOVER’”

The feature reviewed “Candy,” which enjoyed its world premiere the day before (see the last entry), and hyped our drummer as someone “as efficient with the female variety as Velentino, Boyer, Novarro and Gable.”

14 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

It’s only a day later, and already the story was wrong.

See the December 18, 1968, entry, and read about the Alchemical Wedding. A woman removed her clothes during the “happening,” swept up in a performance of Indian music. At some point later in the evening, John Lennon and Yoko Ono instigated their first Bagism performance.

A member of Parliament had heard enough, even though he heard wrong.

Sir Cyril Black, the chairman of the Moral Law Defence Association, said in an interview on December 19, 1968 (and published the next day), said the event was “obscene and likely to deprave and corrupt” and called on the “law officers of the crown to take action.”

AP ran with his account of the night:

Black described the Albert Hall incident, in which a girl in the audience stripped during a stage performance by Beatle John Lennon and his Japanese girl-friend, Yoko Ono, as the last straw in the current permissive society caper.

“This shows how far things are going in this country,” he said. “None of this would have been tolerated as recently as 10 years ago. The man in the street instinctively dislikes it. I think there will be a big swing of the pendulum in the very near future – a swing toward decency.”

Meanwhile, the Daily Mirror poked fun at John as well as its own fawning coverage of Ringo Starr in its coverage from the day before in a cartoon that ran on page 11.

13 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

Friday, December 20, 1968, marked two little milestones: Not only did the Beatles enjoy a partial reunion after weeks apart, they had a new record out, too.

Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr partied together in Kensington. What about John? Well, it’s a little complicated.

Roberto, Cynthia and Julian at the couple’s wedding in July 1970.

Via Reuters, as published on December 28 – but do the math:

Beatle John Lennon’s ex-wife Cynthia has become engaged to the son of a wealthy Italian hotel owner just seven weeks after her divorce from the millionaire pop singer, the Daily Sketch newspaper said here today.

The Sketch said Mrs. Lennon announced her engagement to Roberto Bassanini at a party at her new London home eight days ago.

It is said Mrs. Lennon, 27, refused to confirm the engagement, but quoted Roberto, 26, as saying, “We got engaged at the party last Friday night.”

The February 1969 Beatle Book magazine placed the other three Beatles at the party:

Ringo and Maureen, George and Pattie plus Paul and Linda Eastman were amongst the guests at a party given at her Kensington, West London, home by Cynthia and her friend, hotel owner, Roberto Bassanini.

Cynthia and Roberto did eventually marry, in July 1970.

And what of the other record release in ’68?

The White Album was atop the charts. Let It Be was about to be recorded. In between, in this little window of time, was the Beatles’ annual Christmas record.

DJ Kenny Everett linked the four segments running eight minutes, which were recorded separately by the individual Beatles and sent to 30,000 fans.

“It’s probably the best thing they’ve done in this line,” said publicist Derek Taylor.

John had already read his contributions during his appearance on the BBC early December 12 (see the entry for more) – referring to his “beast friends.” George enlisted Tiny Tim – who recorded “Nowhere Man” – to record his segment, when he was in New York in the fall.  Paul delivered a typically tuneful contribution, and Ringo was his usual charming self, amid the chaos.

12 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

While we can’t say for certain, there’s a good chance the Beatles, their significant others and children were sitting by a television shortly before 1 p.m. London time on December 21, 1968, because we know so many other people were.

That’s when Apollo 8 launched from Kennedy Space Center in Florida en route to the moon’s orbit.

Everything else happening in the world, even the Beatles’ world, comes off pretty mundane by comparison.  But as they say in “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da,” life goes on, and so will we.

That song not only rocketed Marmalade up the British charts, it gave them a high-profile cheerleader.

As reported in the December 21 issue of DISC and Music Echo, John Lennon had joined the Marmalade fan club. In a separate feature on Marmalade elsewhere in the issue, the group describes how they were exposed to the hit-in-the-making by publisher Dick James:

“Everyone will be doing numbers off the album and we’ll get slagged left, right and centre if we do it,” we told him. But when we heard it we knew it was right for us. We were genuinely knocked out by the song – we’d have recorded it even if the Pope had written it! We were the only people that didn’t copy the Beatles note for note. The other versions even had the same brass going through.

Melody Maker’s December 21 issue saw Marmalade’s cover of “Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da” rise eight notches to 15 in the singles chart, while the Bedrocks’ version debuted at 29. (Mike McGear and the Scaffold held tight at No. 1 with “Lily the Pink”). The Beatles double LP retained its grip at No. 1 on the album chart.

Not looking any farther than their own occupied office space, Apple eyed its next act, so to speak. Back to the DISC and Music Echo:

Hell’s Angels, America’s controversial motor-cycle gang, is in Britain at the invitation of the Beatles. And some of them are lined-up to make an album for the Apple label.

Hippie novelist Ken Kesey, man behind San Francisco’s Haight-Ashbury “explosion” two years ago, is with the Angels’ 15-strong party and has been invited to make recordings for the first of a series of new low-budget LPs being planned by Apple (see the December 14 entry for more on that).

Says Beatles Pressman Derek Taylor: “Hell’s Angels have been to Apple and talked to John and George. We’ve given Kesey a tape-recorder and asked him to move around London observing and taping things he feels are interesting. The recordings will become the first of a series of ‘live’ spoken-word LPs which Apple will market at around 10s a time.”

Ken Kesey outside 3 Savile Row.

Richard DiLello’s account in The Longest Cocktail Party adds that Kesey was also given use of an electric typewriter, and a warning about the press by Derek.

“Watch out for them –”

“Why?” he wanted to know.

“Because they’re straights –”

“Well, you’re sitting behind a straight desk –”

“True, true. I forget about that sometimes –“

Others were seeking help from the Beatles on this same December 21, 1968. In his pursuit of a London-area temple for the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, movement founder A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada penned a letter on this date to Shyamasundar Das, who was already in London. “ACB” encouraged Shyamasundar to press George Harrison – who he already had contact with — to join the movement and take him up on his offer of a temple site.

If Shyamasundar Das founds familiar, you may have seen his name (spelled slightly differently) in Get Back.

11 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

The McCartney clan grew on December 22, 1968, when Mike’s wife, Angela, gave birth to a 6-pound,  8-ounce daughter, Benna.

Brother Paul, who was playing the father figure role to girlfriend Linda Eastman’s daughter, Heather, was now officially an uncle.

In an interview with the Daily Mirror published on December 27, the new father – who went by the stage name Mike McGear — explained the name. “We thought of Ben as a boy’s name. When it was a girl, my wife just added a couple letters and we got Benna.”

During the Get Back sessions, on January 10, 1969, publisher Dick James asked if Mike and their father, Jim, had received his telegram offering congratulations of “More gear to the McGear.”

“Mike had become a Benna-ficiary,” Paul replied with what seemed like a road-tested joke.

A DISC and Music Echo report from August said Mike had a children’s story called “Roger Bear” accepted for publication, with Scaffold bandmate Roger McGough illustrating. “Roger Bear” was ultimately published in 1971. (John Lennon was a fan – he had it sitting on his mantle).

While Paul celebrated a new member of the family on December 22, 1968, one of his guitars was hard at work.

The DISC and Music Echo presently on stands said that Chas Chandler was planning to borrow a bass from Paul to play at a reunion of the Animals. The pair of benefit shows, held at Newcastle City Hall, were well reviewed.

The Animals backstage before their December 22, 1968, show in Newcastle. Left to right: John Steel, Chas Chandler, Alan Price and Hilton Valentine.

From the January 4, 1969, DISC and Music Echo:

There onstage together for the first time in nearly four years were Eric, Alan, Chas, Hilton and Johnny, the five members of the original Animals from the days of “House of the Rising Sun.”

It seemed as though nothing had changed. Eric is in great voice and as wild as ever. Chas, tall and chunky. And Alan, ever serious, hunched, eyes closed, over the organ.

The review explains why Chas – who left the Animals in 1966 and later discovered Jimi Hendrix and became his manager — needed Paul’s gear in the first place.

“I haven’t touched a bass since I left,” he told the paper before the shows. “I’m not even sure if I can still play.”

10 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

The only way to properly do justice to the absolute insanity that was the Apple Christmas party on December 23, 1968, is to have the story told in the words of the people who were there (and were reporting on it), an oral history:

Richard DiLello, from The Last Cocktail Party: Preparations had begun at nine that morning. The children’s party was scheduled for 2:30 in Peter Brown’s office. At six o’clock, the adult’s version of the children’s party would begin in Neil’s office.

The crowning glory of the elaborate, stand-up buffet dinner was a 43-pound turkey billed by the supplying butchers as the Largest Turkey in Great Britain.

By 11:30, the Black Room was swollen to standing-room-only proportions with hashish smokers puffing  their brains out while the front office catered to the scotch and Coke brigade. By noon, all pretense had been dropped and the hash heads were indistinguishable from the juicers.

DISC and Music Echo, Scene column, January 4, 1969 issue: About forty children of Apple employees and friends were expected but by 3 o’clock Savile Row was already a solid traffic jam as the privileged young jet set began to arrive.

A man delivering two dozen red tulips addressed to Paul McCartney took one look at the kindergarten in the hallway of number 3 – and fled!

Hell’s Angels – at present guests of the Beatles over here – added a further festive touch by revving up their bikes in the road and doing a swift run around the block.

And still the children flooded in.

Everyone at Apple was running around looking for more chairs, emptying the offices of chairs as the 40 guests began to number more like eighty.

Beatles Book magazine, February 1969 issue: Warmhearted and wonderful Christmas party idea from The Beatles when they invited Apple staff people and friends to  bring their little children to Savile Row and be entertained by clowns and magicians.

Richard: By three o’clock, Peter Brown’s office was a scene of unparalleled frenzy as more than a hundred children screamed and smashed their way through a mountain of ice cream, cake and sausage rolls …

It’s a Starkey party on December 23, 1968,

DISC: There was young Julian Lennon in a striped jersey looking rather thoughtful; Zak and Jason Starr looking very fair and angelic, with their parents not too far away in case Zak started throwing jellies; Bonzo Neil Innes and his wife, Yvonne, and their son Miles.

Internal Apple memo, December 1968:  In the middle of the party we will be visited by Ernesto Castro and April, entertainers to the Queen and the Duke of Cornwall and the late Sir Winston Churchill, MacDonald Hobley and others. Mr Castro is a conjurer, ventriloquist and children’s entertainer. April is his assistant and also his wife and she plays guitar. So the idea is that all of us at Apple will bring our children and those of us who have no children are invited to bring a couple unless they can arrange to have one of their own in the meantime.

Richard: In the greatest tradition of English garden-party entertainers, they lanced into their live-wire routine of silvered voice projections, sleight-of-hand wonders, and barnyard-beast imitations. The eardrum-shattering squeals of delight from the youngsters did not decrease one decibel the entire length of their performance. They closed the show with a sizzling rendition of Lettuce Leaf Hop.

DISC: One seven-year-old made a bit of a fuss saying her handbag should be locked up as she had £7 in it, but otherwise everything was very orderly. …

John, Yoko and Mary Hopkin spread holiday cheer at the Apple Christmas party on December 23, 1968.

George Harrison, from Anthology: John and Yoko were dressed up as Father Christmas.

Richard: John and Yoko, in full Christmas drag, were waiting for them in the Press Office when the show let out. Mary Hopkin had joined them to lend an additional two paws to the distribution of gifts.

Tony Bramwell, from Magical Mystery Tours: They wandered around, going Ho Ho Ho and Yo-ko-ko, patting people on the head, doling out presents to staff, family of staff and loved ones and significant others. We all got lovely presents. I think I got a set of goblets that year.

Richard: Unrattled by the greedy stampede for toys, John Lennon stood calmly in the middle of the room, deadpan, muttering through the false beard on top of his own beard, “Ho, ho, ho.”

The kitchen counter and sideboard were barely holding up under the weight of a thousand assorted hors d’oeuvres, platters of cold meat, and jellied fish. Salads, cakes, bowls of fruit and boiled sweets, biscuits, and cheese lined the floor.

John and Yoko, freed from the burden of their costumes, sat on the Press Office floor …

Father and Mother Christmas no more: John and Yoko sit and party.

Chris O’Dell from Miss O’Dell: [A]ll was going well until Sweet William and Frisco Pete showed up, drunk and stoned and high out of their minds.

Richard: It took only three seconds for this atmosphere of intense gaiety to turn radically and almost irrevocably sour. Frisco Pete, elbows pumping him energetically through the crowd, covered the length of the room in four enormous strides. He poised menacingly over the slight figures of John Lennon and Yoko Ono.

“What the fuck is goin’ on in this place?!?” he screamed at them. The room dropped into a clammy, itchy silence. No one moved.

“We wanna eat! What’s all this shit about havin’ to wait until seven?!”

Chris: I was standing in the press office, drinking my third or fourth Scotch and laughing about something with Richard DiLello, when Frisco Pete walked in and demanded some fucking food.

Richard: Mavis’ [Smith, Derek Taylor’s assistant] husband Alan, gallantly interrupted Frisco Pete with a request for a little consideration for the situation. His efforts were rewarded with a single closed-fist punch … The room darkened. Frisco Pete returned his attention to John Lennon.

Ken Kesey, from Zapple Diaries: The executive [Alan Smith was actually a reporter] went somersaulting backward all the way to the wall, where he slowly slid down in a pile against the baseboard and lay there, like a rumpled rainbow. The room suddenly polarized, all the Englishmen springing to one side of the carpet to surround their clobbered countryman in an instant display of British pith, all the Yanks to the other.

George: I didn’t go because I knew there was going to be trouble. I just heard that it was terrible and how everybody got beaten up.

Richard: [Frisco Pete said,] “You got more fuckin’ food in that kitchen than there are people and it’s all locked up and those two fuckin’ broads upstairs tell me I’ve got to wait until seven o’clock just like everybody else! There’s a 43-pound turkey in that fuckin’ kitchen and I fuckin’ want some of it now. John Lennon … looked up at the frightening figure of Frisco Pete in total bewilderment.

Chris: It was madness for a time in the press office, and I backed into a corner, standing as far away as I could, knowing that even though the Angels liked me, all hell could break loose and any moment.

Richard: Tapping him lightly on the shoulder, Peter Brown moved between John Lennon and Frisco Pete just as a fresh flow of verbal punches was about to begin.

“Now listen, Pete, we have every intention of feeding you and I apologize for the delay, but I was hoping you could appreciate that the kitchen staff have been working since nine o’clock and they’ve been under considerable pressure. We’re waiting for the caterers to finish laying the tables and it shouldn’t take more than another ten minutes and then we can all go downstairs and gorge ourselves to death but please, I beg you, be patient.”

That did it! An up-front answer to an up-front question.

Neil Aspinall, from Anthology: I can remember that everybody was getting hungry, and then a huge turkey came in on a big tray with four people carrying it. It was about ten yards from the door to the table where they were going to put the turkey down, but it never made it.

Richard: When the door to Neil’s office was thrown open ten minutes later, everyone could see it was going to be a sumptuous feast. The massive catering tables buckling to support food and drink ran the length of three walls.  Frisco Pete was the first to reach the main table where the Largest Turkey in Great Britain sat. Before the waiter had a chance to work up his best carving voice … Pete grabbed a firm hold on the poor dead bird’s body and without any further ceremony ripped the turkey’s left leg from its torso.

Tony: The table had been stripped bare while all the present-giving was happening in another room. Our turkeys, stuffing, and plum duff were all gone, with only a few bones chucked under the table and a few crumbs of mince pies on plates to show what had been there.

Neil: The Hells Angels just went ‘woof’, and everything disappeared: arms, legs, breast, everything. By the time it got to the table there was nothing there. They just ripped the turkey to pieces, trampling young children underfoot to get to it. I’ve never seen anything like it.

Tony: Most of the cutlery and glasses was unused so probably they’d just stuffed fists full of grub in their mouths and the rest in their pockets as they went. They swigged all the wine from the bottles. There was nothing left.

The Merry Pranksters had ruined the whole event and now they were seriously drunk and mean. They threw up on carpets and insulted their hosts. Enough was enough and a few days later they were turfed out of the building by George who was very embarrassed and by Derek Taylor who also shouldered some of the blame.

Richard: There was nothing left but the washing up.

Before the madness, kids enjoy the Apple Christmas party.

Ringo Starr, from Anthology: They proceeded to ruin the kids’ party – and then we couldn’t get rid of them. They wouldn’t leave and we had bailiffs and everything to try to get them out. It was miserable and everyone was terrified, including the grown-ups. It was like the edgy Christmas party.

Pattie Boyd, from Wonderful Tonight: “Well that was strange,” said Ringo, with his gift for understatement.

Neil: They did get asked to leave Apple. I asked them, but they got into that hippy language: ‘Well, you didn’t invite us, so you can’t ask us to leave. ‘In other words, as George had invited them, so George was going to have to ask them to go. I think George did it very well – I can’t remember exactly what he said, but it was like: Yes/no – Yin/ Yang – in/out – stay/go. You know – BUGGER OFF!’ And they said, ‘Well, if you put it that way, George, of course,’ and left.

Richard: It was a very fine party, just as the Press Officer had said it would be.

9 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

Christmas Eve was here, and with it, the individual Beatles likely enjoyed private time with their families. We know Paul McCartney was in Merseyside because Linda Eastman took photos of the Crimble celebration. The other Beatles were likely home in the London area, John Lennon and Ringo Starr recovering from the Apple Christmas party the day before (see the December 23 entry for more on the party).

Maybe the Beatles should have sent the Hell’s Angels to Liverpool. The McCartneys and their neighbors didn’t have any problem making sure the Christmas feast would have a bird to carve as the Liverpool Daily Post mentioned on Page 1 that there would be “No shortage of turkey.” Remember, Paul didn’t become a vegetarian until the mid-1970s.

Earthly pursuits included simple tasks like man finding a celebratory meal. In space, mankind reached new heights.

On December 24, 1968, Apollo 8 entered lunar orbit. In what would have been around 2:30 a.m. GMT on Christmas Day, the Apollo 8 crew delivered a live reading from the Book of Genesis that was broadcast worldwide. It was estimated one in four people – 1 billion worldwide – watched the telecast.

Earlier in the day on December 24, astronaut William Anders photographed the planet in what would be known as the Earthrise photo.

It would be published in England on January 6, 1969, and provide the inspiration for David Bowie’s “Space Oddity.”

8 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

The party was on, and the feeling – the kind that only came that time of year – was there.

Let’s raise a glass – but don’t look down – to Linda Eastman. Having a professional photographer who would never leave her camera behind has given the world a view of Paul McCartney and Beatles we otherwise wouldn’t have had.

Like on Crimble 1968. Paul and Linda were on the Wirral to celebrate the holiday with family, specifically at Jim McCartney’s home in Heswall. Lacking in written recollections, Linda’s photos tell plenty of story. Some of these have been posted on her terrific archival Instagram account, others at different exhibitions and elsewhere, and they probably span a couple days around the holiday.

Anecdotally, Paul seems to be having an absolute blast. He sports an authentic smile in every photo.

From Linda’s Instagram: “Self-portrait with Paul. Christmas, Liverpool, 1968.”

This photo of Paul with his uncle Harry and aunt Jin first emerged in the 2021 McCartney 3,2,1 documentary.

The word was out about the town: Two different stories emerged from this one image with local Christmas carolers, who were greeted by a Beatle when they knocked on his dad’s door.

From Linda’s Instagram: “Paul with carol singers. Heswall, 1968⁣”

From the There Are Places I Remember: Beatles Liverpool Locations blog:

What’s truly remarkable about this photo is that the young man on the extreme right of the photo, over Paul’s left shoulder is Neil Harrison.

In 1979, aged 28, Harrison joined the cast of the West End musical Beatlemania, playing the part of John Lennon. In March 1980, after the musical’s last West End show, Harrison formed The Bootleg Beatles with fellow cast members Andre Barreau and David Catlin-Birch, the musicians reportedly investing their dwindling finances in two guitars – an Epiphone and a Gretsch – as well as two Vox amplifiers, four black polo-necks and a wig.

Harrison performed the John role in the Bootleg Beatles until retiring in 2011.

Meanwhile, according to the Instagram account of the Staves — whose debut was co-produced by Glyn Johns and son Ethan – the other man holding a guitar in the photo is the father of the members of the British folk group (once a trio, now a duo).

The turkey situation was less chaotic than at Apple headquarters a few days earlier. Paul took control of the carving.

New dad Mike McCartney was probably there, and we can guess he was picking at that bird. From the December 14, 1968, issue of DISC and Music Echo, in discussing upcoming holiday plans, which included visiting Jim Mac if baby Benna was born before Christmas:

“It’ll probably be the usual Christmas scene with pud and turkey,” he says. “If I’d spent it at our home, I’d have liked to try something different, there must be other fantastic things you can have.

“We like French cooking, and my wife cooks such fantastic pork chops with garnishings I could eat those all through Christmas. …

“I’m a traditionalist at heart though. It would be such a gas if people could be like that and jolly all the time.”

The same issue placed hit Apple artist Mary Hopkin with her parents, too, in Wales. The newspaper was positively cruel in describing her:

Mary Hopkin, who is looking a shade fatter after three months in the chart, will throw diets to the winds at Christmas which she will spend quietly with her family in Pontardawe, Wales.

“I want to spend a quiet Christmas with my family,” says Mary. “I get to see them so rarely now, and I love Christmas at home.”

Broadcast across the kingdom, Queen Elizabeth II delivered her annual Christmas message, another event Linda captured on film.

On the heels of the tense White Album sessions and just a week from reuniting for a new project after some weeks apart, a certain quartet from Liverpool could take heed at a remark from the Queen that served as a bit of a warning:

The British people together have achieved great things in the past and have overcome many dangers, but we cannot make further progress if we resurrect ancient squabbles.

7 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

We don’t know what Paul McCartney and his father discussed the morning of Boxing Day 1968, but we can be certain it was a lot more pleasant than their conversation a year earlier.

“My dad brought the bad news into me this morning like the figure of doom,” Paul told Ray Connolly as published in the December 27, 1967, issue of the Evening Standard. The broad consensus had spoken, the BBC’s broadcast of Magical Mystery Tour endured “scorching” and “scathing” reviews, in Connolly’s words. The story was under the headline: “Maybe we goofed, says Beatle Paul.”

“I suppose if you look at it from the point of view of good Boxing Day entertainment we goofed really,” Paul said.

We don’t know much about how the Beatles spent December 26, 1968, but if they pondered on Boxing Days past, you’d have to think they were happy with their situation.

If the group had any kind of crisis of confidence, by now it should have been restored. A “Hey Jude” and White Album will do that, between its commercial and critical success.

An ad in the December 15, 1969, Boston Globe.

Magical Mystery Tour, meanwhile just finished a brief run at a Boston theater, one of just a couple American showings of the film late in 1968 — it wasn’t broadcast on American TV. It wouldn’t see a widespread cinematic release in the country until 1974.

And now, the band was exactly a week from taking another stab at a TV show, a documentary of them working in the studio preparing for a concert.

6 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

Today’s Weather: Very cold in most areas. (Daily Mirror, December 27, 1968)

It’s a judgement call to say it was long and lonely, but there’s no argument this was a cold winter.

Under the front-page headline “Freeze-up hits the weekend sport,” the December 27, 1968, Evening Standard reported on the cold front leading to cancellations of sporting events, not just on this Friday, but into the upcoming weekend. The nation’s workers enjoyed the day indoors, taking in a three-day weekend “as bitter winds blew in from the north.”

The paper continued:

London was a motorists’ paradise, with empty car parks and deserted bays.  St. James’ Square – normally crammed with cars on a working day – was as empty as on a wet Sunday.

Traffic on all roads into London was reported “extremely light” and motorists enjoyed a clear run into the capital.

It was this cold. (From the December 28, 1968, Guardian).

Not everyone took the day off, like director Michael Lindsay-Hogg, who was fresh off the Rock and Roll Circus and already in the planning stages for the upcoming Beatles project, due to begin six days later.

Michael went on a scouting mission in London and was joined by others – we don’t know who – but it wouldn’t be a surprise if some combination of producer Denis O’Dell and Apple head Neil Aspinall joined him.

We can pinpoint this specific outing because Michael mentioned it explicitly during a conversation on January 6, 1969.

The remark came in the context of a large group discussion (including all the Beatles, plus Michael, Denis, Yoko Ono, George Martin and others) as they searched for a venue for a live concert, along with what kind of audience they should have.

Paul: We shouldn’t just try and build something like the Tower Ballroom ‘cause we can go to the Tower Ballroom.

Michael: That was one of the reasons we started veering off on these ideas was when we were looking at locations that Friday after Christmas. All the locations looked like four steps up from a boutique, you know what I mean? Like four years ago everybody’s shooting in a boutique, now it’s some disused sawmill or whatever it is. They just looked [like] plastic-real locations …

Others talked over each other saying they looked “so phony.”

Michael’s quote was used in the Get Back docuseries, but pulled out of sequence. In Get Back, it’s presented as part of a similar discussion on January 8. The usage of it in that context is understandable, but it simply didn’t happen that day.

There’s really no indication of the kinds of locations that were scouted. But they had free run of London’s streets while they looked.

***

Apple publicist Derek Taylor was sick of censorship, “fed up with all the humbug in this country.”  A story in the December 27, 1968, Western Daily Press retold the familiar Two Virgins story – John and Yoko are naked on the cover, few are selling the record, few are buying the record and no one is listening to the record.

But John and Yoko needed to do this for the sake of art and honesty.

“We are not revolutionaries and I am not a nudist,” said Mr. Taylor.

“We didn’t contemplate the consequences, and we were certainly not asking to go to jail for Christmas.

“We simply wanted, once and for all, to show two people standing naked with nothing to hide.

“If artistic people had to wait until the man in the street accepted what they do, it would never be done.”

Even allowing for the fact that the naked Mr. Lennon and the naked Miss Ono are hardly the apples of everyone’s artistic eye, reaction to the record has already helped to prove Mr. Taylor’s point.

***

As Michael and Co. searched for a suitable concert venue, Apollo 8 returned to earth. Evening papers and next-day headlines celebrated the splashdown, which occurred shortly before 4 p.m. London time about 900 miles southwest of Hawaii.

5 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

The momentum for the Beatles was real with just four days left in 1968, with the music papers announcing more and more year-end superlatives in issues dated December 28.

Melody Maker’s chart poll landed the Beatles on top for the year based on a points system, propelled by the singles “Hello Goodbye,” “Lady Madonna” and “Hey Jude” and the Magical Mystery Tour EP.  NME splashed photos from the Mercury Theater portion of the Mad Day Out photo session as the “Best 1968 pics from Camera Press.”

In the US, Billboard said the Beatles’ double LP earned gold album status from the Recording Industry Association of America – their 13th such honor – after one week of sales for the record.

Billboard also reported Apple was on track to build a half-million dollar studio in Beverly Hills in tandem with production company Campbell, Silver, Cosby Corp (the Cosby was comedian Bill), the parent company of Tetragrammaton Records. Roy Silver, CSC’s president, was slated to meet with Apple Records exec Ron Kass in January 1969 to finalize the deal, which was first broached as the companies worked out their deal for Tetragrammaton to distribute Two Virgins in North America.

Ground will be broken in March on the $3 million CSC entertainment complex which will take about 14 months to complete. …

CSC will build and operate the recording studio, with the Beatles and other Apple acts utilizing the facilities as a West Coast base.

By 1971, Tetragrammaton had filed for bankruptcy and the Beatles were no more.

This was the season for 1969 predictions, too, like these from Don Short in the December 28, 1968, Daily Mirror. In a column headlined “New Year Circular,” Short predicted John Lennon and Yoko Ono would marry in May while Paul McCartney and Jane Asher would reconcile in October.

December brought a much darker prophecy: The Beatles would split up.

4 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

When the Beatles reconvened on January 2, 1969, to begin what would be known as the Get Back/Let It Be sessions with the idea they’d write a fresh set of songs to perform live, they weren’t coming in empty-handed, by any stretch.

We don’t have any record of what the Beatles were doing on December 29, 1968, so let’s use the 12-track Let It Be LP, the original document of these sessions released in May 1970, plus “Don’t Let Me Down” (the “Get Back” single B-side) as the basis of this inventory and status report with less than 100 hours to go to the Twickenham sessions.

FINISHED SONGS:  “Across the Universe,” “Maggie Mae” and “One After 909”

“Across the Universe”
“I think it’s a waste just banishing it,” John Lennon said on January 7, 1969, when suggesting the group give the song a stab. “I’d sooner stick it in here.”

“Across the Universe” was nearly a year old by this point, having been completely recorded in February 1968, prior to the group’s journey to India. While the Beatles made a few attempts at a live version of “Across the Universe” in January 1969, they ultimately abandoned the song early in the sessions.  I go quite a bit into the song’s story here.

The version of the song you hear on Let It Be is the exact same recording the Beatles made in February 1968 – and released on a charity LP in December 1968. It’s just manipulated by Phil Spector.

“Maggie Mae”
I’ll stick an asterisk on this one since it’s just a snippet of a Liverpool folk song, a musical ad-lib during the vast Get Back sessions. “Maggie Mae” (or “May”) is the oldest song on the record, and then some. John played it at the famous church fête where he met Paul, so it was part of the Lennon-McCartney story from the outset. The song itself dates hundreds of years earlier.

“One After 909”
First recorded in 1963 in the same session that yielded “From Me To You,” the Beatles completed “One After 909” but didn’t release it. They abandoned the song until its spontaneous revival on January 3, 1969. (The 1963 version was released on Anthology 1 in 1995.)

In the wake of that first attempt at the song at Twickenham, John conceded, “I always meant to change the words a bit. … We always thought it wasn’t finished.”

But Paul thought it was “great” and George Harrison agreed: “Most people don’t give a shit what the words are about, as long as it’s popping along.”

As captured in the Let It Be film, Paul described the song to Michael Lindsay-Hogg in the context of the early Lennon-McCartney partnership.

The song dates to 1959-1960, and a recording from 1960 survives.

While the song was sped up for a more raucous (and improved) presentation, they didn’t change a single lyric from 1963. And once they established it, they didn’t dwell too long on it.

“Maybe we should do it without practicing. You know, practicing will fuck it up,” George said on January 3.

***

IN THE WORKS:  “Dig A Pony,” “Don’t Let Me Down,” “For You Blue,” “I’ve Got a Feeling,” “Let It Be,” “The Long and Winding Road,” “Two of Us”

When the Beatles hit the Twickenham sound stage on January 2, several songs were already in some stage of completion:

“Dig a Pony”
We’re left to guess when John wrote the song – presumably it was in November or December 1968. It’s new to the other Beatles – at least George, who asked John to clarify the lyric – when it was introduced during the opening moments of the Get Back sessions on January 2. The song is incomplete, but many lyrics are intact, and the melody is unchanged from the final version.

“Don’t Let Me Down”
The song existed in pieces entering the sessions, appearing on a work tape in December 1968. As we can hear in the early days at Twickenham, the lyrics and melody were basically complete, it just needed an arrangement and some riffs, and Paul and George contributed to making it the song we know now.

“For You Blue”
I’m not sure on this one. There seem to be a lot of claims this was written in late 1968, but I can’t find something definitive to prove that. George plays it a couple times as background noise until the song is more formally introduced to the band on January 9, six days into the sessions. Further, Paul describes it as George’s “last-night song,” while the songwriter himself elaborates on how easy it was for him to write. I’m leaning toward this being a product of this first week of the month vs. something from December 1968, but I can be convinced either way.

“I’ve Got a Feeling”
John’s contribution to this song – the “Everybody Had a Hard Year” section – existed in some form for several months. We have a work tape from earlier in the year, and also a filmed performance from December 12, 1968 (see the calendar entry above — Day 4 — for more on that). It’s a little less clear when exactly Paul’s part of “I’ve Got a Feeling” was written, but he seems to have it well formed – and already combined with John’s section – by the time the Get Back sessions began, implying there was a songwriting session between at least John and Paul sometime in late December 1968.

“Let It Be”
The earliest recording of the song in progress came September 5, 1968, in between takes of “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” and with Eric Clapton sitting in with the Beatles. This version was officially released in 2018, as part of the White Album deluxe reissue.

I wrote  at some length about this little 1-minute, 18-second ditty here.

It’s worth noting, as I did at the link above, the lyrics hardly advanced between this jam in September 1968 into the Get Back sessions – only a few lines had been established. Musically, it’s hard to divine what Paul had in mind – the rest of the band is improvising, and perhaps they had never heard the song before this moment.

“Two of Us”
Paul brought the song to the Get Back sessions pretty well formed – but unknown to the rest of the band, who first heard it on January 2. The lyrics didn’t really change from this first take to the end, and while the song’s presentation was in flux for a few weeks – it began acoustic, then they made several attempts at an electric version before settling on acoustic again – the melody didn’t really change and any adjustments to the song’s arrangement were minor.

We get to watch this initial introduction in the 2021 Get Back docuseries.

Paul included a photo in the 2022 Lyrics book that he says pinpoints the writing of the song, which he has long maintained was about his experiences driving with Linda purely for the fun of getting lost together.

From Paul McCartney’s The Lyrics.

“There’s a photograph of me in the Aston Martin, sitting with the driver’s door open and my feet out,” he said. “I’ve got my guitar. That’s me writing ‘Two of Us.’”

He doesn’t date the photo, but if we look close enough at the hair and stubble, and with the knowledge he was in the UK with his car, this photo was probably taken in October 1968.

“The Long and Winding Road”
Looking to write a song evocative of Ray Charles, Paul began to write “The Long and Winding Road” sometime in 1968, inspired by a stretch in the Scottish highlands en route to his farm. He had much of the tune in place, but he had very few lyrics written by the time he played the song at Twickenham, first in a snippet on January 3 and then a longer stretch four days later.

I write a bit about these initial takes here.

***

NOT YET WRITTEN: “Get Back” and “I Me Mine”

“Get Back”
Now quite famously, Paul conjured “Get Back” from thin air on January 7, 1969, and through the magic of film (and tapes) we can experience its birth ourselves.

“I Me Mine”
George describes the song’s origin story on January 8, discussing his inspiration and how he wrote the song from scratch the night before.

3 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

John Lennon and Yoko Ono made a brief appearance at the Royal Institute Galleries in Piccadilly on December 30, 1968, by invitation of 40 teachers who had been fired by the Guildford School of Art. The occasion was the “Guildford Minus Forty” exhibition, in support of the terminated staff.

Per a report in the December 31 Guardian, John accepted the teachers’ invite “because I like them … I sympathise with them.”

Opening the exhibition, John and Yoko handed out “quarto-sized” papers with the simple instruction: “Fold it nine times – John Lennon, 1968.”

John Lennon at the Guildford Minus Forty event, December 30, 1968. (Photo by John Walmsley)

He later told the assembled media: “You can’t fold a piece of paper more than eight times, so I asked them to fold it nine times. It was something I remembered from my boyhood.”

On leaving the dias after speaking, John gave the simple message, “Well, keep swinging!”

The exhibition ran through January 9, 1969.

2 days until the start of the Get Back sessions

The New Year’s Eve party itself was fun. Pattie Boyd described the regular parties at Cilla Black’s Portland Place flat in Marylebone as “fantastic,” and that would imply her 1968 New Year’s Eve party was, too.

After midnight, as 1968 became 1969, and back at her home with George Harrison in Esher – that’s when things cracked.

Pattie and George at home, earlier in 1968.

From Pattie’s 2007 autobiography Wonderful Tonight:

We arrived home in good spirits but then everything went swiftly downhill. The French girl didn’t seem remotely upset about Eric and was uncomfortably close to George. Something was going on between them, and I questioned George. He told me my imagination was running away with me, I was paranoid.

The French girl was 20-year-old model Charlotte Martin – she and Pattie were actually friends, but over time, she was demoted to being described as simply “the French girl.” Eric, meanwhile, was Eric Clapton, who dated Charlotte for several years. If you’re looking for another wrinkle to the George-Pattie-Eric bizarre love triangle, you’re in luck.

Charlotte Martin sits over John’s right shoulder during the filming of the “All You Need Is Love” live broadcast in July 1967.

Eric left Charlotte at some point in late 1968, and she ended up briefly moving in with the Harrisons.

“She was always flirtatious with George, but so were a lot of girls and he, of course, loved it,” Pattie wrote.

“I pulled [Eric’s] chick once,” George said in a 1977 interview with Crawdaddy.

We’ll get back to the Charlotte-George-Pattie story again after the Get Back sessions are underway.

Peter Brown wrote in his 1983 memoir The Love You Make that Pattie spent midnight locked in the bathroom crying, but I’ll figure Pattie remembers her night better than the Apple exec. The story sounds feasible, though, with everything having gone “swiftly downhill.”

Cynthia Lennon had already moved from her troubled marriage, divorcing John in November 1968. In a story published in several British newspapers on December 31, 1968, Cynthia opened up on her time with her ex.

It is a period of the past. At first it was very beautiful, then terrible. But enough. I am 26 years old: I feel young. I want a life all my own, like every normal person in this world.

Cynthia was speaking from Sestriera, Italy, where she was vacationing with boyfriend Roberto Bassanini, who said he planned to open a discotheque in London in the new year.

John is reported to have spent New Year’s Eve in a couple places, and that’s certainly reasonable.

Lennonology places John and Yoko at the Arts Lab for a gathering, while Albert Goldman’s Lives of John Lennon – yes, I know – says the same and pushes the party to a second location.

After starting off at the Lab, the party had wound up at [promoter Michael] Boyer’s home in Islington, where Lennon turned to the promoter, whom he barely knew, and told him with tears in his eyes that he was the only person he had met in years who wanted nothing from his friendship.

Or, maybe we don’t completely believe multiple second-hand accounts describing people weeping this New Year’s Eve, and instead consider that John took in a rock show.

According to the January 11, 1969, DISC and Music Echo, John was an “interested spectator at London’s Alexandra Palace New Year’s Eve party.” That would place him at a concert that featured Joe Cocker, John Mayall & the Bluesbreakers, the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band and the Small Faces among several others on the bill. (The Iveys — Badfinger before the name change — were also slated to perform, but multiple accounts say they didn’t play because the show ran too late.)

The Small Faces’ set was particularly notable for what happened on stage and then off it. Following a period of breakup rumors and “infuriated at the inability to reproduce a stage sound equivalent to their studio work,” Steve Marriott dropped his guitar mid-performance and yelled “I quit” as he stormed off stage.

Marriott’s next move is why this story comes up at all here. Enter Peter Frampton … and a notable producer.

Here’s Frampton, from the 2002 Gallagher, Marriott, Derringer & Trower: Their Lives and Music:

“I was at Glyn Johns’. He’d said … ‘I want to play you this record that I just finished recording and mixing. It’s a new band that we started and finished recording in ten days.’ He put it on and I said, ‘Who is this?’ And he said, ‘Led Zeppelin.’ This was a momentous occasion all ‘round.”

Marriot called that night/early morning, after Frampton listened to Side 1 of the Zeppelin debut, telling him he was leaving the Small Faces. The outcome of the phone call was Marriott and Frampton forming Humble Pie, who would later be produced by Glyn.

But first, little more than 24 hours later in the opening days of 1969, Glyn would get to work with a much more established band at Twickenham Film Studios.

***

Judy Sims, “Our Girl in Hollywood” who reports the U.S. scene in the DISC and Music Echo, wrapped up the old year in the January 4, 1969, issue of the paper and certainly spoke for many:

And that was 1968, folks. A good year and a bad one, but I remember the good parts because I can never relate to bad parts for more than a day or so.

The Beatles made 1968 brighter, just as they did with 1967, 1966, 1965 and 1964. Thank God for them and the double album and Yellow Submarine and Magical Mystery Tour and for everything they do — because everything they do makes me happy, “and you know that can’t be bad.”

1 day until the start of the Get Back sessions

Ring out the old, ring in the new!

It’s hard to pin down what the Beatles did the first day of 1969, but we can at least agree they enjoyed a wildly successful 1968, certainly as far as their music was concerned. With the Fabs, it always got bigger and better, and Paul McCartney signaled as much in an quote he gave to Ray Fullagar that was published a few days before New Year’s.

“We are continuously experimenting with sounds and instruments,” Paul McCartney told me. “Fortunately as a group we are in a better position than many to do this. We have no intention of fading away into obscurity, and will be producing sounds our fans will not only like, but will buy.

“No one can forecast at this stage what our 1969 sounds will be. They just happen during a rehearsal, rarely are they planned in advance.”

Hindsight is 20-20, but it’s incredible to think that the Beatles fading into obscurity was a possibility in our earthly timeline.

The rehearsals mentioned by Paul that would debut the Beatles’ 1969 sounds were ready to begin in a day’s time.

Any new Lennon-McCartney originals would benefit publisher Northern Songs, which just expanded its catalog. According to the January 1, 1969, Daily Express, Northern Songs completed its purchase of the 4,000-song Lawrence Wright songbook for £812,500.

Northern Songs chief Dick James shared the full scope of the catalog with the Beatles during a visit to Twickenham on January 10, 1969, an appearance that would be overshadowed later that day, when George left the group.

But we’re getting ahead of the story. On Wednesday night, January 1, 1969, the individual Beatles probably caught a little bit of TV, maybe messed around with a song or two at home before ending their extended, extremely busy break and getting back to work the next day.

The first day of the Get Back sessions

The phones began to ring at 8:30 a.m. This was going to be a new routine at a new venue, so a friendly wake-up call couldn’t hurt.

“[B]etween bites of breakfast, I’d telephoned round all four fellows to remind them it was getting up time and they were due at Twickenham by eleven,” roadie Mal Evans wrote in the March 1969 Beatles Book magazine, citing his January 2, 1969, diaries.

The Get Back sessions were underway.

Despite Mal’s best effort, Paul McCartney didn’t arrive until 12:30 p.m., “having come by underground, then local train, then taxi from Hampton Court station,” Mal wrote. “He’d meant to do the entire journey by public transport but, knowing he was late, he chickened out and caught a cab rather than wait at the bus stop!”

We can see Mal and assistant Kevin Harrington set up the stage, in the opening shots of both Let It Be and Get Back.

Here’s Kevin, from his 2015 memoir “Who’s the Redhead on the Roof …. ?”:

Michael Lindsay-Hogg, the director, asked us to push a piano in a certain direction so they could film us pushing a piano in a certain direction. We duly obliged and, with Mal carrying a drum skin in one hand and me carrying a cymbal, we pushed the piano in this certain direction. Mad. Me, I would have done that in two trips. Mal would have put the drum skin on the piano first then pushed the piano in a certain direction. Then we would have stopped, turned and walked away in a certain direction. Mad.

By the time Paul arrived, the other three Beatles were already gathered on the soundstage, John Lennon (“Don’t Let Me Down,” “Dig a Pony”) and George Harrison (“All Things Must Pass,” “Let it Down”) offering samples of their respective newest offerings, potential songs for the upcoming concert they were going to stage.

In the past few weeks, a live TV concert that was first publicly teased in mid-September — in the midst of the White Album recording sessions – evolved into a whole new concept: recording a documentary of the group writing and then rehearsing new songs for the live show.

Mal and Kevin did their best to give the group all the best conveniences. Per Mal:

Toast, cornflakes and tea were ready for each arrival on the open space of Stage One every morning. Beatles prefer to get where ever they’re going for the day and THEN start the day’s eating!

Kevin [Harrington] and I brought over all the food from the Studios canteen. For lunch they started off by using some new flats which have been built for film actors and actresses so that they can make themselves at home between ‘takes’ without leaving the studio area. That didn’t work because the food was cold by the time we served it so we block-booked a couple of big tables in the canteen and added a bottle or two of good wine to whatever was on the day’s menu!

“It’s like a rock cake, but needs butter or something” – John Lennon on Twickenham’s dry buns, January 2, 1969 (From Get Back)

Much of the tone of the rest of the month plays out in this short session: negotiations over how and where to stage a show, collaboration on new songs and improvised jamming on familiar oldies, reminiscence of the past with an eye to their future and general productivity among the self-created chaos. It all plays out in the two hours and forty minutes on the Nagra tapes documenting the day’s audio. Anytime we hear a little bit of an edge in a remark, it’s at once a signal everyone is coming into the sessions from a different place and with a different agenda as well as an indication we’re laying our own biases into the story, knowing how it all played out. (I’ve written a little bit about this first day, when the blog first launched; it’ll get to a rewrite sooner than later)

“This is fine for the documentary for a day or two,” Michael said of Twickenham at one point in a conversation with Paul and Apple Films producer Denis O’Dell on January 2.

Paul: We’ll move out of here [when we’re ready], or maybe we won’t.

Denis: Do a couple of days, see what happens, get a little of film.

We saw what happened, even if the parties involved couldn’t process it in real time as we can in retrospect. What played out over the subsequent 30 days altered the band’s history – its interpersonal relationships, its musical and visual output –and has been written and rewritten, edited and re-edited, understood and misunderstood.

Only a few months removed from the sessions, Mal recognized a little space was needed, speculating in the same March ’69 Beatles Book magazine cited earlier that a “sort of ‘Beatles at Work’ documentary production on the side … could be saved and shown later perhaps even 10 years later, to let people see … the Beatles start off to build up a new set of songs.”

Context always matters. And here’s what this advent calendar project taught me.

Common knowledge holds true: After the “Hey Jude” live performance for David Frost’s show, the Beatles became enamored with performing before a live audience again. They bandied about a few venue ideas before deciding to write songs on the fly and perform somewhere, stuff they’d sort out at Twickenham, for better or worse.

While that story is still accurate, knowing how John, Paul, George, Ringo and the other important adjacent figures spent their December 1968 day-to-day completely informs the January 1969 story so much more.

John and Yoko hold court in the waiting room of his dentist on December 14, 1968. Photo by Susan Wood.

No one hustled like John, in tandem with Yoko Ono. They’d host multiple media outlets while undergoing dental work, in order not to waste any time (see December 14 entry above). They’d bring the press to his house (December 16), or sneak in a radio appearance in the middle of a concert performance (December 12). They’d perform at a charity show (December 18) and make an appearance in support of teachers they didn’t even know (December 30).  They played Mr. and Mrs. Claus under threats of violence at the Apple Christmas party (December 23). All of this was on the heels of Yoko suffering a miscarriage (November), their continued problems selling Two Virgins (ongoing since November) and a drug bust (October). John justifiably entered 1969 on fumes.

Then there’s Paul, who went on a beach vacation mostly in anonymity. He visited his family Merseyside. This was on the heels of a trip to New York to spend time in Linda’s hometown, and then a lengthy stay at Paul’s farm in Scotland.

From Linda’s Instagram: “Self-portrait with Paul. Christmas, Liverpool, 1968.”

Look at pictures of Paul from this period – when he went to Portugal with Linda Eastman and her daughter, Heather (see December 10-17 above), and from his visit to Liverpool for Christmas (December 25, of course) – he smiles a true, broad smile. These are private photos, usually taken by Linda. Paul is animated yet relaxed. He wasn’t hustling at all – there would be time for that. Instead, Paul was falling deeper in love with Linda and experiencing what it would be like to be a father. Clearly, he loved it. And when he arrived at Twickenham, he wasn’t burnt out, but instead recharged and alive.

A further juxtaposition is stark: John had just lost a child in a miscarriage; a month later, Paul found out his girlfriend was pregnant.

George, meanwhile, enjoyed a wife and a girlfriend (see December 31). The former was on the verge of moving out of the house on account of the latter. George enjoyed fruitful time away from the Beatles, spending an extended period in the United States, producing Jackie Lomax and spending time with Bob Dylan and the Band. He had plenty of good musical material, but my personal take is that no matter what, his life at home was coloring every other aspect of his life, Beatles-life included. (Beyond that, George had his tonsils removed in early February, so it stands to reason he just didn’t feel good in January).

Not relied upon as a songwriter, Ringo had it easier than the others (although he did continue to write in this period). Still, it’s hard to think he wasn’t distracted by the upcoming production of The Magic Christian, and all the lines he needed to learn.

Michael and Glyn both entered the sessions on an upward trajectory. Michael didn’t yet know his production of the Rolling Stone’s Rock and Roll Circus (December 11-12) would be shelved until 1996. For now, it was an imminent project, one that would springboard him right into an even bigger venture with the biggest band in the land.

Glyn climbed the same ladder. Not only was he a part of the Rock and Roll Circus, but he also was waiting on Led Zeppelin’s debut (which he produced) to be released in the coming weeks (see December 31). But that band were relative nobodies at this point. Glyn was tabbed to be the first man other than George Martin to produce the Beatles.

It’s with this collected knowledge we’ll enter Twickenham on January 2, 1969. The mighty Beatles, had reassembled to push to greater heights even while standing at what could be seen as their peak. This was a really good time to be a Beatles fan.

The band had nothing to prove, yet their audition was underway.

10 Comments

Filed under Day by day, Extra

TMBP Extra: Stay till it’s time to go

“The world is still spinning and so are we and so are you. When the spinning stops – that’ll be the time to worry. Not before. Until then, The Beatles are alive and well and the Beat goes on, the Beat goes on.”

These were the instructions Apple publicist Derek Taylor articulated April 10, 1970, the marker for the end of the greatest pop music group there ever will be, the day the papers blared “PAUL QUITS THE BEATLES.”

That was more than 53 years ago, and it’s still not time to worry.

I felt compelled to write about “Now and Then,” the Beatles’ new single, and “last song,” even though I generally keep my focus to the Get Back sessions of a half-century earlier. One of the reasons I started researching and writing They May Be Parted in 2012 is because I thought I was investigating the endgame of the Beatles, and I wanted to understand that ending. Listening to the Nagra tapes of the sessions themselves, the January 1969 sessions weren’t what we were led to believe, a revision to history that now is mainstream opinion since the release of the Get Back docuseries.

I’ve posted some takes on “Now and Then” on social media and voiced a few others as a podcast guest, but since I have this permanent platform, I wanted to post here for posterity, too.  Maybe this is more for me than anyone else. I tried to keep my thoughts in some kind of order, but this is certainly a brain-dump of high order. 

“Now and Then” was released just over a week before I published this post, and today hit No. 1 on the U.K. charts. My feelings on the song and the accompanying video evolved in that short time, and may continue to, I’m sure. 

There simply won’t be and can’t be consensus on any aspect of “Now and Then.” Contemporary critics routinely called Beatlemania a fad. One writer famously said Sgt. Pepper was “ultimately fraudulent.” Abbey Road was described by another as “an unmitigated disaster.” So from the jump, we can abandon any thought of a common opinion and there doesn’t need to be. It only matters what it means to you, if anything. It’s like attending a funeral — you go because you feel compelled to mourn for your own personal reasons. 

Assuming we all know the original backstory – John Lennon committed the idea to cassette in the late 1970s and widow Yoko Ono handed the tapes of this and three other songs to Paul McCartney in 1994 for use as potential new Beatles songs – let’s pick things up in 2023 with the song’s rollout.

One basic truth to have any “Now and Then” discussion: We simply have to accept the fact this song and video exist in order for us to have a reasonable conversation about it. Whether the song should or shouldn’t exist never was our call. It was up to the two living Beatles and the two estates.  In the 1990s, the decision was made to break the seal and reopen the Beatles as an active unit. This is just a continuation of that act in the 1990s. 

Is it real, or is it TDK?

George Harrison left explicit instructions to his son, Dhani, and Jeff Lynne outlining how he wanted Brainwashed, his posthumous 2002 LP, to be finished after his death. John didn’t leave behind anything except for the music itself.  If the tape of “Now and Then” actually said “For Paul” in John’s writing, we just don’t know if that meant it was dedicated to him, meant to give to him to listen to or something else altogether.  It could imply there were tapes that said “For May” or “For Sean.” Maybe there were and no one else has seen them.

Since I’m picking up the story in 2023 via 1995, I’m not really going to get into John’s original intent or inspiration in writing the song, the deeper Lennon-McCartney relationship, the Carl Perkins “My Old Friend” stuff or anything along those lines. There are some terrific voices in the Beatles-sphere who can offer their opinions on that. But ultimately, the most important interpreter is Paul. If we all (myself included) can hyper analyze every word and every note the Beatles play and find deeper meaning, certainly Paul McCartney has the right to decode and determine how a song by his longtime songwriting partner and dear friend spoke to him.

The 2023 rollout window for “Now and Then” was highly compact, and it allowed for knee-jerk takes and then knee-jerk reactions to those initial takes.

Straight away, Paul stumbled into the first step of the rollout in June, saying AI was key to completion of the song. Really, the blame goes to the person who wrote the BBC headline: “Sir Paul McCartney says artificial intelligence has enabled a ‘final’ Beatles song.”

The clumsy description spoiled the promotion of project from the outset, even if the actual use of the the technology wasn’t anything wrong. If he just said “we’re using same gadgets Peter Jackson used to clean up the Get Back tapes” it wouldn’t have put the rollout on the back foot from the start.

Jackson put together the magnificent making-of documentary, unveiled the day before the song’s actual release, on November 1, pulling together unseen home movies of John and Anthology-era footage of George. How remarkable it was to be able to enjoy them both so alive again. Watching Paul singing along to “Now and Then” in the 1990s was extremely moving. 

Regardless of whether the musical performances of “Now and Then” in the documentary were a solid sync job or authentic, the sequence made a straight-line link between the ’90s and now, pulling “Now and Then” into the Anthology era as second-act Beatles song and doing everything it could to ensure George was part of this story. Utilizing the Yellow Submarine time travel and timeline was deft, and little easter eggs like using Magic Alex’s sound “technology” was clever and really gave a deep nod and wink to let even the most diehards know, “We’re with you, and this new song can speak to you too.”

It’s entirely anecdotal, from social media, but people started to weep once they heard John Lennon’s voice in isolation. It took me until a few seconds later, when Paul joined him in harmony.

To me, that’s one of the most important and enjoyable features of “Now and Then,” which was officially released on November 2  — Paul owns his “old-man voice,” which he really hasn’t done during his solo career as it’s become more prominent. He’s treating his Beatles work separate from his solo work, which often takes him out of his realistic vocal range.  But for this final Beatles track, he leans into that feature of his singing voice as a complement to John, who in his mid-to-late 30s when he recorded “Now and Then” was about 40 years Paul’s junior at his current age. It would have been like John singing with an 81-year-old George Burns in 1977.

I think the strings do a great deal of heavy lifting. Superficially, this is the biggest difference with whatever they would have worked on in the ’90s, when they didn’t employ strings at all on “Free as a Bird” and “Real Love.” I found the arrangement lovely and not overwhelming, evocative enough of “I Am the Walrus” and “Eleanor Rigby” without overwhelming the listener.  

I’ll say the same for the harmonies that were sampled from “Because,” “Eleanor Rigby” and “Here, There and Everywhere.” Giles Martin applied them tastefully and subtly enough into the fabric of the song it sounded completely natural. 

Ringo was typically fab on the kit, and his added color on vocals were welcome. But it’s too bad surviving guitar parts were mixed low as they were. Much has been said about Paul’s slide solo in tribute to George — it did make you miss George, and it probably would have had a little more flavor and guts to it had he been around.

I do really feel like they were playing together, instead of this cross-generational, cross-dimensional, analog-digital hybrid. It’s all very tidy, under four minutes, not at all ponderous and conscious of overstaying its welcome. 

I thought John’s original recording was a little slight — I didn’t love any of the original piano sketches as they were taped, to be completely honest.  Certainly they were never meant to be release-ready or anything close to it. 

In contemporary interviews from the Anthology era, Paul himself didn’t pull any punches when it came to the quality of the content itself. On what was clearly “Now and Then,” from the November-December issue of Beatlefan:

Yeah, what’s it called – I don’t know, it didn’t really have a title [Sings: “You know/it’s true; it’s up to you…] That beginning bit’s great and then it just goes a bit crummy. We all decided that it’s not one of John’s greatest songs. So that we’d have to manipulate all of that, which is just a little bit more difficult.

I think it’s worth considering how different a 1995 version of the song would have been. We can be assured the overall sound would be different with Jeff Lynne at the helm as originally planned. Would the song have been adjusted, arranged and edited the same way? At the minimum, George would have had a say in the song’s writing and arrangement, probably in a 50-50 manner with Paul (minus some percentage offered to Ringo Starr, to be fair).  This is in no way meant to come off crass, but without George’s presence, it freed Paul to fully arrange “Now and Then” with complete freedom. 

Even if every now and then he’d feel so insecure, Paul had the confidence to open up the door to collaborate with John as an equal partner, as he felt he had every right to do and had done so many times. If Paul thought the song’s original bridge was clunky, extraneous and “crummy,” he was justified in killing it. I know it seems insane to say “No, we don’t want to hear any more unreleased John Lennon,” but the Beatles were always great editors. Paul McCartney is a magnificent song fixer, and this is the ultimate, final fix.  

And this returns me to Get Back. I long heard on the Nagras and everyone has since seen in the series that the others explicitly trusted Paul with their songs. He led the way, whether it was John letting him arrange “Don’t Let Me Down” or George welcoming input to “I Me Mine.” That’s just two small examples in a career of such collaboration.

Does “Now and Then” sound like it belongs on a Beatles LP? Of course not, and why should it?  Not quite a mashup, but think of it like the single version of a compilation album. It’s pieces from four of the last six decades woven in under four minutes, I think quite seamlessly. At times “Now and Then” sounds natural in any of those decades, though without fitting comfortably in any of them, either.

What is the essence of a Beatles song? Is it the personnel or the sound? The Beatles didn’t always record as a quartet, certainly not as the years went on. You only needed one Beatle to make Beatles song sometimes. “I Me Mine” was written and rehearsed with no input from John in 1969, and then recorded with him out of the country and having quit the band in 1970. Yet it’s undeniably a Beatles song.

Paul and Ringo got together recently for lunch, but had to send each other files of “Now and Then” — they couldn’t even bother to record the last song in the same room. Maybe there’s something calculated to that: If they couldn’t be in the same room as John and George, then they wouldn’t record without them as a unit. They’d all be apart, together.

The Beatles’ wild variety of styles defines the group’s music. So if it’s not the personnel or sound that makes a Beatles song a “Beatles song,” maybe the essence of a Beatles song rests in its original time — the 1960s. But, as George and John sang in response to “you say stop” in “Hello Goodbye,” they can stay till it’s time to go. And they decided it wasn’t time to go.

In the last 30 years, since the Threetles first attempted “Now and Then,” we lost George Harrison, Linda McCartney, George Martin, Neil Aspinall, Geoff Emerick and so many others, people close to the Beatles, their story and their music. John wasn’t the only one missing anymore, and each of these people to some degree must have been on Paul’s mind as he worked on “Now and Then,” this song of memories and loss. 

And to that end, it’s also quite clearly a song of closure. The promotion — so actively screaming that it’s the “last” Beatles song — leans completely into that. But the music does too. I’m not any kind music theorist, but I have two operational ears, and this is what I hear:

“Now and Then” is the only one with a conclusive ending. 

I love the concept of the butterfly effect, so let’s apply it here. There’s no answer, but what if “Free as a Bird” had the poor demo tape recording and “Now and Then” ended up salvageable in 1995? Maybe the quote I shared earlier, where Paul said it was “not one of John’s greatest songs” would have meant “Real Love” would have been the lone reunion song? We’re left to guess.

And that brings us to the video. It’s divisive and a little insane. 

There’s a lot to unpack. My initial reaction was that it was too contrived, too scattered. The 1990s Anthology outtakes were outstanding, as it was in the making-of film — images of George we hadn’t seen before and the Threetles at work. But my overall first impression was that this video was the kitchen sink, trying to stuff so much in four minutes: present-day performances, ’90s video, archival footage and photos. 

I would imagine that if they didn’t do the “Free as a Bird” video already, that would have been an apt solution. 

That’s one way to go, when there’s a member of the band who’s not around anymore, a creative film that had few images of the Beatles as they had been and none of the surviving members pictured in the ’90s. “Real Love” took a more straightforward approach, compiling moments from throughout their career with 1990s footage. But there’s no narrative.

Roy Orbison died shortly after the first Traveling Wilburys album came out in 1988, and in the “End of the Line” video, released a few months later, he was represented by a rocking chair with a guitar and a photograph shown during his vocal lines. It was moving and sad, but I don’t think it was an approach that would have worked for the Beatles, with half the band gone. It would have come off maudlin, and completely against the idea that “Now and Then” was a full-group effort. (Mind you, I don’t think “End of the Line” was maudlin — it was still in the early phases of mourning Orbison)

I was completely skeptical when I first saw 1967-era “Hello, Goodbye” John and George intermingling with 2023 Paul and Ringo. The word “cringe” was thrown around a lot on social media, and I get that. My thinking on the video quickly evolved from the first to second viewing — your milage may vary. 

We’re faced with two issues: Would the departed Beatles want to be represented this way? And if so, should it be as silly as presented? 

Paul as Beatle Paul (above) in 1980 and George as Beatle George (below) in 1974.

Let’s not pretend George and John didn’t revisit their Fab Four period in their solo years. Putting aside the many callouts in songs, either cryptic or overt, George did things like dress in the same Sgt. Pepper costume he wore in “Now and Then” and elsewhere, and John literally had the Beatles on the cover of a solo record. Complicated feelings they may have been, they never wrote off that time.

St. Pepper George in the 1974 “Ding Dong” video, one of many Beatle guises he employed as he tried to “ring out the old.”

In their day, the Beatles embraced comedy in their films and promos, and beyond into the solo years (George was the funniest of all, with his estate keeping that flame alive). Even with a wistful lyric at play, it wouldn’t be the Beatles’ way to match it with a bleak visual. 

One way they could have gone would have been to make multiple videos, something the Beatles did themselves over their career and when they went solo. Build out a full video of the ’90s sessions co-mingled with appropriate ’70s Lennon home or studio footage. The Beatles at work on their last song.

Another direction would be a more direct clip/highlight reel, something they added to the video for “Real Love,” but now with another 30 years of memories added, and earlier footage cleaned up.

Finally in the last video, they could have really owned the time-travel element and gone completely bananas. Stick Paul into the “How Do You Sleep” sessions. Put 60 years of Ringos into one room. Get the 1980 Paul pretending to be the 1960s Paul and put him on stage with the Plastic Ono Band in Toronto. You get the idea. Really play into the fact these four guys were always together, even when we can document they weren’t.

Those were my knee-jerk impressions of the video, kind of a mixed bag. Then I watched the video again, this time with my wife, who helped me open my eyes to a better interpretation.

A lot of people really don’t like the video, and I get it. It’s jarring, uncomfortable and the technology — as impressive as it is — still isn’t perfect. 

Peter Jackson described the concept as “Ringo and Paul in 2023 trying to work on a song and they get invaded by the 1967 Beatles,” but I think there’s much more to it than that. 

It’s Ringo and Paul deliberately surrounding themselves with the John and George they knew so well. At a funeral, wake, shiva – this is when we remember and talk of the vibrant life of the person we’re remembering, sharp and in color, not memories of their weakness or death. These days are filled with silly memories and pictures from all across their lives, laughter among the tears. I don’t think there’s any doubt Paul and Ringo vividly remembered a vitalized John and George — and even their own former vigorous selves — when they were in the studio last year working on “Now and Then.”  It’s just the Beatles and their closest associates:  George Martin was embodied through his son, and Mal Evans through the MAL technology used to extract John’s voice. 

This part of the video isn’t meant for us, it’s for them. We just get to be voyeurs. 

As the video nears the end, their life literally flashes before their eyes. Again, the animation is awkward in spots, but I’ll argue in favor of the concept. When I look at a photo of people I’ve lost in my life, their memory isn’t stuck in that 4×6 print. They live, they move. Every time I see their face, it reminds me of the places we used to go, a concept Ringo and George certainly understood.  

And then we were snapped back into reality, the reality of 1964, and the Beatles all together in a single time and place. With their concluding bow, taken from their performance of “She Loves You” in the “A Hard Day’s Night” film, the Beatles vanish before our eyes, and the lights spelling out their name burn out. That was the point in the video I lost it. 

If the rest of the video was for the surviving Beatles, this ending was for us, the Beatles fan, the rest of the world. They were singing to us now, not each other. 

Deliberate or not, this ending evokes a dramatic sequence in The Compleat Beatles, an unauthorized but highly valuable biography of the band from 1982. In the sequence on the breakup of the band, we see the iconic black-and-white photos of the band from April 1969, with George, Ringo, John and Paul vanishing, in sequence, as “I’m So Tired” plays in the background, the aggressive lyric, “I’d give you everything I’ve got for a little peace of mind.” 

In the “Now and Then” video, that tone has changed. Go to the source in “A Hard Day’s Night,” and you can hear the valedictory statement they give prior to their bow: “With a love like that, you know you should be glad.” See, it does work both ways: If Paul McCartney and Peter Jackson can search for deep meaning in these kinds of things, so can I.

The Beatles have said “Hello, Goodbye” many times. Breakup rumors started in 1964, and continued until they actually broke up. Until their partial reunions. The only endings that ultimately matter are John Lennon’s death in 1980 and George Harrison’s in 2001.

I’ll bring things back one more time to Get Back, Let It Be and original breakup, with these points: No living Beatles (out of four) approved the Get Back edit by Glyn Johns in 1969 (it later came out packaged with the Let It Be reissue in 2021). That’s two fewer Beatles that approved “Now and Then.”

I don’t think they could have sold “Now and Then” as a genuine cosmic reunion of friends, not merely co-workers, without the Get Back docuseries coming first. That set the stage to a mainstream audience that the the Winter of Discontent was much milder than forecast. 

And thus ends the Beatles’ final act. Or does it?  Paul offered this relevant remark to his fan club magazine, Club Sandwich, in the Winter 1995 issue, when asked if Anthology was the “last word” on the group:

I don’t know. That’s the difficult thing. In the electronic press kit we all enigmatically said, “Where does the circle end and where does it begin? An end is a beginning, of sorts.” But to me, for now, it’s an end.

An entire new generation of fans had the experience of hearing the “last” new Beatles song as their first new Beatles song, something some of us got to experience in the 1990s, in the 1980s, in the 1970s and all the time in the 1960s. Where does the circle end and where does it begin?

There is no end to the Beatles, as long as they occupy our lives, our ears, our eyes. Don’t take it from me. Just ask Derek Taylor, who said this on April 10, 1970: 

“The Beatles have changed so many lives, that the need for them still exists. The hope that they represent still exists. And as long as that exists, then they have to exist. They’ve got to be there to fulfill that need, and who are they to take themselves away, to say ‘OK kids, that’s it’? …

“If the Beatles don’t exist, you don’t exist.”

4 Comments

Filed under Extra